public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Cc: "linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	realmz paranoid <realmz6@gmail.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org" 
	<uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org>,
	Parisc List <linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: *: remove '__init' for setup_profiling_timer()
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 14:14:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5271F54F.8070607@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5271F4A9.40804@asianux.com>

On 10/31/2013 02:11 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 10/31/2013 01:45 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> On 10/23/2013 07:36 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> Most of architectures not use '__init' for setup_profiling_timer(), so
>>> need remove it, or can generate warning (e.g. arc with allmodconfig):
>>>
>>>     MODPOST vmlinux.o
>>>   WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x3c682): Section mismatch in reference from the function write_profile() to the function .init.text:setup_profiling_timer()
>>>   The function write_profile() references
>>>   the function __init setup_profiling_timer().
>>>   This is often because write_profile lacks a __init
>>>   annotation or the annotation of setup_profiling_timer is wrong.
>>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
>>> ---
>>>  arch/arc/kernel/smp.c          |    2 +-
>>>  arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c |    2 +-
>>>  arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c       |    2 +-
>>>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
>>> index bca3052..3bdac11 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
>>> @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
>>>  /*
>>>   * not supported here
>>>   */
>>> -int __init setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
>>> +int setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
>>>  {
>>>  	return -EINVAL;
>>>  }
>>> diff --git a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c
>>> index 11789be..3bef058 100644
>>> --- a/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c
>>> +++ b/arch/blackfin/mach-bf561/smp.c
>>> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ void __init platform_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
>>>  	init_cpu_present(&mask);
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> -int __init setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier) /* not supported */
>>> +int setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier) /* not supported */
>>>  {
>>>  	return -EINVAL;
>>>  }
>>> diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
>>> index 8a252f2..2e8cd36 100644
>>> --- a/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
>>> +++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/smp.c
>>> @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu, struct task_struct *tidle)
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
>>> -int __init
>>> +int
>>>  setup_profiling_timer(unsigned int multiplier)
>>>  {
>>>  	return -EINVAL;
>>
>> In theory this change is OK. However this is legacy code at best and it would be
>> better to define a weak definition in kernel/profile.c and remove this cruft from
>> relevant arches. I'll send out a patch.
>>
> 
> That sounds good to me.
> 

Hmm... if so, recommend to modify another architectures which also only
return "-EINVAL", but without "__init" prefix.


Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang

  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-31  6:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-23  2:05 [PATCH] arch: *: remove '__init' for setup_profiling_timer() Chen Gang
2013-10-31  5:45 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-10-31  6:11   ` Chen Gang
2013-10-31  6:14     ` Chen Gang [this message]
2013-10-31  6:22       ` Vineet Gupta
2013-10-31  6:36         ` Chen Gang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5271F54F.8070607@asianux.com \
    --to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=realmz6@gmail.com \
    --cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org \
    --cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox