From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932072Ab3KAWYr (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Nov 2013 18:24:47 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]:45170 "EHLO mail-ob0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756215Ab3KAWYo (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Nov 2013 18:24:44 -0400 Message-ID: <52742A2A.9080008@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 17:24:42 -0500 From: Rob Herring User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Rothwell CC: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dt-rh tree with the powerpc tree References: <20131101162002.4dd386299ec42e8d8d032be2@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20131101162002.4dd386299ec42e8d8d032be2@canb.auug.org.au> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/01/2013 12:20 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Rob, > > Today's linux-next merge of the dt-rh tree got a conflict in > arch/powerpc/include/asm/prom.h between commit a3e31b458844 ("of: > Move definition of of_find_next_cache_node into common code") from > the powerpc tree and commit 0c3f061c195c ("of: implement > of_node_to_nid as a weak function") from the dt-rh tree. Ben, I can pick these 2 patches up instead if you want to drop them and avoid the conflict. Rob