public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] highmem: Make kunmap_{local,atomic}() take pointers to const void
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 07:40:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5276974.Sb9uPGUboI@opensuse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220615051256.31466-1-fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>

On mercoledì 15 giugno 2022 07:12:56 CEST Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> kunmap_{local,atomic}() currently take pointers to void. However, this
> is semantically incorrect, since these functions do not change the memory
> their arguments point to.
> 
> Therefore, make this semantics explicit by modifying the
> kunmap_{local,atomic}() prototypes to take pointers to const void.
> 
> As side effects, compilers will likely produce more efficient code and
> they won't any longer need casts to pointers to void where these
> functions take arguments of type pointer to const void.
> 
> Suggested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
> Suggested-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
> ---
> 
> v1->v2: Change the commit message to clearly explain why these functions
> should require pointers to const void. The fundamental argument behind
> the commit message changes is semantic correctness. Other bonuses come as 
> side effects. Obviously there are no changes to the code. 
> 
> Many thanks to David Sterba and Ira Weiny for suggestions and reviews.
> 
>  include/linux/highmem-internal.h | 10 +++++-----
>  mm/highmem.c                     |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
As said in another email, this is the second version of "[PATCH] highmem: 
Make __kunmap_{local,atomic}() take "const void *"". You see that I changed 
subject (involuntarily, that was just a mistake when formatting).

This is why I'm writing: make Maintainers find easily which patch this is 
the second version of.

Sorry for that unwanted change to the subject.

Thanks,

Fabio



      reply	other threads:[~2022-06-15  5:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-15  5:12 [PATCH v2] highmem: Make kunmap_{local,atomic}() take pointers to const void Fabio M. De Francesco
2022-06-15  5:40 ` Fabio M. De Francesco [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5276974.Sb9uPGUboI@opensuse \
    --to=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox