From: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] highmem: Make kunmap_{local,atomic}() take pointers to const void
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 07:40:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5276974.Sb9uPGUboI@opensuse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220615051256.31466-1-fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
On mercoledì 15 giugno 2022 07:12:56 CEST Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> kunmap_{local,atomic}() currently take pointers to void. However, this
> is semantically incorrect, since these functions do not change the memory
> their arguments point to.
>
> Therefore, make this semantics explicit by modifying the
> kunmap_{local,atomic}() prototypes to take pointers to const void.
>
> As side effects, compilers will likely produce more efficient code and
> they won't any longer need casts to pointers to void where these
> functions take arguments of type pointer to const void.
>
> Suggested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
> Suggested-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
> ---
>
> v1->v2: Change the commit message to clearly explain why these functions
> should require pointers to const void. The fundamental argument behind
> the commit message changes is semantic correctness. Other bonuses come as
> side effects. Obviously there are no changes to the code.
>
> Many thanks to David Sterba and Ira Weiny for suggestions and reviews.
>
> include/linux/highmem-internal.h | 10 +++++-----
> mm/highmem.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
As said in another email, this is the second version of "[PATCH] highmem:
Make __kunmap_{local,atomic}() take "const void *"". You see that I changed
subject (involuntarily, that was just a mistake when formatting).
This is why I'm writing: make Maintainers find easily which patch this is
the second version of.
Sorry for that unwanted change to the subject.
Thanks,
Fabio
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-15 5:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-15 5:12 [PATCH v2] highmem: Make kunmap_{local,atomic}() take pointers to const void Fabio M. De Francesco
2022-06-15 5:40 ` Fabio M. De Francesco [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5276974.Sb9uPGUboI@opensuse \
--to=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox