public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.12 released .. and no merge window yet .. and 4.0 plans?
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 18:00:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5277D2C3.3020203@ahsoftware.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFwLkvSkparyvekdmMyvr6Srw1KkzTBp=_w0oQRWnPpJug@mail.gmail.com>

Am 04.11.2013 01:10, schrieb Linus Torvalds:

(...)
> Onto a totally different topic: we're getting to release numbers where
> I have to take off my socks to count that high again. I'm ok with
> 3.<low teens>, but I don't want us to get to the kinds of crazy
> numbers we had in the 2.x series, so at some point we're going to cut
> over from 3.x to 4.x, just to keep the numbers small and easy to
> remember. We're not there yet, but I would actually prefer to not go
> into the twenties, so I can see it happening in a year or so, and
> we'll have 4.0 follow 3.19 or something like that.
>
> Now, it's just a number (since we've long since given up on
> feature-related releases), and it's at least a year away, so why do I
> even mention it at all?
(...)
> Comments?

You could go towards the lovely number Pi (π):

3.12
3.13
3.14
3.141
3.1415
3.14159
3.141592
3.1415926
(...)
4.0

That would

- not be crazy numbers,
- make some math loving people happy,
- make people remembering that number,
- be a test for broken version number parsers,
- not as boring as usual version numbers,
- be in good tradition (e.g. TeX),
- make some maintainers hate me for that suggestion, ;)
- ...

Regards,

Alexander Holler



  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-11-04 17:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-04  0:10 Linux 3.12 released .. and no merge window yet .. and 4.0 plans? Linus Torvalds
2013-11-04  3:11 ` Tony Luck
2013-11-04  6:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-04 19:08   ` Josh Boyer
2013-11-04 19:53     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-11-07  4:40   ` Greg KH
2013-11-07  9:01     ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-04 17:00 ` Alexander Holler [this message]
2013-11-04 19:49   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-11-04 20:16     ` Alexander Holler
2013-11-04 23:02     ` Alexander Holler
2013-11-06 13:42       ` Keith Curtis
2013-11-07 10:17         ` Alexander Holler
2013-11-15  1:11           ` Keith Curtis
2013-11-04 20:05 ` Olof Johansson
2013-11-04 20:12 ` Hans de Bruin
2013-11-04 21:46 ` Linux 3.12 released " Jan Engelhardt
2013-11-05  5:06   ` Aldo Iljazi
2013-11-05  5:08   ` Alexander Holler
2013-11-04 21:57 ` Linux 3.12 released .. and no merge window yet " One Thousand Gnomes
2013-11-10  4:13 ` Alexandre Oliva

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5277D2C3.3020203@ahsoftware.de \
    --to=holler@ahsoftware.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox