From: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>,
konrad.wilk@oracle.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] drivers: xen-selfballoon: consider slab pages
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 11:30:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52786640.90403@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5277D7EA.9000801@citrix.com>
On 11/05/2013 01:22 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 04/11/13 12:39, Bob Liu wrote:
>> Currently the goal_page in xen-selfballon doesn't consider much about pages used
>> in kernel space.
>> A typical usage is slab pages, without consider slab pages the goal_page result
>> may be too rough and lead extra memory pressure to guest os.
>
> Can you provide some real world figures where the calculatation got it
> wrong? What was the resultant behavior? Swap death? OOM killer?
>
Sorry, I didn't run any testing I just think it's unreasonable while
reading the source code.
vm_memory_committed() only calculate pages which mapped to process
address space, but the kernel itself(like block, fs and network
subsystem) may occupy some memory. And it's possible that those
subsystem may occupy a significant amount of memory in some situation.
I'm afraid if we don't consider those kernel memory while calculating
goal_pages, guest memory will be set lower than guest really needs.
>> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/xen/xen-selfballoon.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-selfballoon.c b/drivers/xen/xen-selfballoon.c
>> index 21e18c1..4814759 100644
>> --- a/drivers/xen/xen-selfballoon.c
>> +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-selfballoon.c
>> @@ -191,6 +191,8 @@ static void selfballoon_process(struct work_struct *work)
>> tgt_pages = cur_pages; /* default is no change */
>> goal_pages = vm_memory_committed() +
>> totalreserve_pages +
>> + global_page_state(NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE) +
>
> Does SLAB_RECLAIMABLE want to be included here? Unless I'm
> misunderstanding here, SLAB_RECLAIMABLE is effectively free.
>
SLAB_RECLAIMABLE isn't effectively free, it means the slab page is in
used but can be reclaimed(freed) during memory pressure.
>> + global_page_state(NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE) +
>
> This bit looks fine to me.
>
>> MB2PAGES(selfballoon_reserved_mb);
>> #ifdef CONFIG_FRONTSWAP
>> /* allow space for frontswap pages to be repatriated */
>
> David
>
Thanks for your review.
--
Regards,
-Bob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-05 3:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-04 12:39 [PATCH] drivers: xen-selfballoon: consider slab pages Bob Liu
2013-11-04 15:13 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-11-04 17:22 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2013-11-05 3:30 ` Bob Liu [this message]
2013-11-05 10:33 ` David Vrabel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52786640.90403@oracle.com \
--to=bob.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lliubbo@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox