public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: Bob Liu <lliubbo@gmail.com>, <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	<xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] drivers: xen-selfballoon: consider slab pages
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 10:33:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5278C991.3040700@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52786640.90403@oracle.com>

On 05/11/13 03:30, Bob Liu wrote:
> 
> On 11/05/2013 01:22 AM, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 04/11/13 12:39, Bob Liu wrote:
>>> Currently the goal_page in xen-selfballon doesn't consider much about pages used
>>> in kernel space.
>>> A typical usage is slab pages, without consider slab pages the goal_page result
>>> may be too rough and lead extra memory pressure to guest os.
>>
>> Can you provide some real world figures where the calculatation got it
>> wrong? What was the resultant behavior?  Swap death? OOM killer?
>>
> 
> Sorry, I didn't run any testing I just think it's unreasonable while
> reading the source code.

I'm not keen on changes to heuristics without testing with real
workloads and a demonstration that it is better in practice.

> vm_memory_committed() only calculate pages which mapped to process
> address space, but the kernel itself(like block, fs and network
> subsystem) may occupy some memory. And it's possible that those
> subsystem may occupy a significant amount of memory in some situation.
> 
> I'm afraid if we don't consider those kernel memory while calculating
> goal_pages, guest memory will be set lower than guest really needs.
> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/xen/xen-selfballoon.c |    2 ++
>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/xen-selfballoon.c b/drivers/xen/xen-selfballoon.c
>>> index 21e18c1..4814759 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/xen/xen-selfballoon.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-selfballoon.c
>>> @@ -191,6 +191,8 @@ static void selfballoon_process(struct work_struct *work)
>>>  		tgt_pages = cur_pages; /* default is no change */
>>>  		goal_pages = vm_memory_committed() +
>>>  				totalreserve_pages +
>>> +				global_page_state(NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE) +
>>
>> Does SLAB_RECLAIMABLE want to be included here?  Unless I'm
>> misunderstanding here, SLAB_RECLAIMABLE is effectively free.
>>
> 
> SLAB_RECLAIMABLE isn't effectively free, it means the slab page is in
> used but can be reclaimed(freed) during memory pressure.

Similarly to the pages used for the page cache, I think the intention is
for the selfballoon_reserved_mb value to include this.

>>> +				global_page_state(NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE) +
>>
>> This bit looks fine to me.
>>
>>>  				MB2PAGES(selfballoon_reserved_mb);
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_FRONTSWAP
>>>  		/* allow space for frontswap pages to be repatriated */

David

      reply	other threads:[~2013-11-05 10:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-04 12:39 [PATCH] drivers: xen-selfballoon: consider slab pages Bob Liu
2013-11-04 15:13 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-11-04 17:22 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2013-11-05  3:30   ` Bob Liu
2013-11-05 10:33     ` David Vrabel [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5278C991.3040700@citrix.com \
    --to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=bob.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lliubbo@gmail.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox