From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932077Ab3KFHP5 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 6 Nov 2013 02:15:57 -0500
Received: from mail.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.172]:39654 "EHLO
	ns3.lanforge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750867Ab3KFHPy (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 6 Nov 2013 02:15:54 -0500
Message-ID: <5279ECA8.5080701@candelatech.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 23:15:52 -0800
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Organization: Candela Technologies
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130805 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Is __ffs64 supposed to be zero based?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Similarly named methods elsewhere seem to indicate it is supposed to be
ones-based counting (ie, bit (1<<0) would be considred 'bit 1'.

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com