From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
To: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com"
<davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>, Alex Elder <alex.elder@linaro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] gpio: davinci: Fixed a check for unbanked gpio
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 17:12:47 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <527A2B37.4040308@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <527A28EF.9070601@ti.com>
Hi Grygorii,
On Wednesday 06 November 2013 05:03 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Hi Sekhar, Linus,
>
> On 11/06/2013 12:49 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On Wednesday 06 November 2013 03:45 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
>>> Hi Linus,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Linus Walleij
>>> <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Prabhakar Lad
>>>> <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Linus Walleij
>>>>> <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Lad, Prabhakar
>>>>>> <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patch fixes the check for the offset in
>>>>>>> gpio_to_irq_unbanked() function.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this a regression that should go in right now?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yes it needs too.
>>>>
>>>> But on top of *what* exactly?
>>>>
>>>> This does not apply to my gpio tree devel branch and
>>>> not even on the mainline kernel.
>>>>
>>> Looks like this needs to go via ARM tree as the earlier
>>> patches have gone via ARM tree itself [1].
>>> If you can ACK it Sekhar can get it in via ARM tree.
>>
>> The dependent patches are all in linux-next through ARM SoC queued for
>> v3.13 merge. This fix can either be sent late in merge cycle once Linus
>> has pulled ARM SoC or after v3.13-rc1 comes out.
>
> Pls, wait a bit - this fix is incomplete :( The below changes have to be
> done too:
Can either you or Prabhakar send a separate patch (series) with only the
fixes?
Thanks,
Sekhar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-06 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-02 15:39 [PATCH v4 0/6] gpio: daVinci: Fixes and feature enhancement Lad, Prabhakar
2013-11-02 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] gpio: davinci: Fixed a check for unbanked gpio Lad, Prabhakar
2013-11-05 12:39 ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-06 9:33 ` Prabhakar Lad
2013-11-06 9:56 ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-06 10:15 ` Prabhakar Lad
2013-11-06 10:49 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-11-06 11:33 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-11-06 11:42 ` Sekhar Nori [this message]
2013-11-06 11:36 ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-02 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] gpio: davinci: remove unnecessary printk Lad, Prabhakar
2013-11-02 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] gpio: davinci: use irqdomain Lad, Prabhakar
2013-11-04 18:27 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-11-05 8:00 ` Prabhakar Lad
2013-11-02 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] gpio: davinci: add OF support Lad, Prabhakar
2013-11-04 18:28 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-11-05 8:53 ` Prabhakar Lad
2013-11-05 16:59 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-11-06 10:08 ` Prabhakar Lad
2013-11-06 11:55 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-11-02 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] ARM: davinci: da850: add GPIO DT node Lad, Prabhakar
2013-11-02 15:39 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] ARM: davinci: da850 evm: add GPIO pinumux entries " Lad, Prabhakar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=527A2B37.4040308@ti.com \
--to=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=alex.elder@linaro.org \
--cc=davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox