From: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
To: "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RFC: get_dma_buf_unless_zero ?
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 20:59:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <527A9F87.2070400@vmware.com> (raw)
Anyone else but me that feels such a function could be useful?
My main use-case is that it would resolve the mutual refcounting problem:
1) drm buffer object caches a dma_buf pointer which it refcounts
2) The dma-buf holds a refcount to the buffer.
This is resolved today by having the user-space visible part of the
drm-buffer holding the refcount to the dma_buf. When user-space closes
the drm-buffer, the reference goes away, and eventually the buffer is
freed, when all external dma-buf users are done with the dma-buf
However, this also means that the dma-buf remains for the buffer
lifetime even when there are no external users, which bugs me a bit.
This can be resolved by viewing the drm buffer as a lookup structure
that doesn't hold a refcount to the dma-buf, but that means that the
lookup structure (buffer) would need to share locks with the dma-buf
implementation, unless we have a get_dma_buf_unless_zero, which means we
can use locks local to the lookup structure, the drm buffer.
(See the last part of the kref documentation for a detailed discussion
of this).
Now I don't think keeping the dma_buf for the drm buffer lifetime is a
HUGE problem, but I just wanted to get people's views of this.
Thanks,
Thomas
reply other threads:[~2013-11-06 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=527A9F87.2070400@vmware.com \
--to=thellstrom@vmware.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox