From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Corrupted low memory in v3.9+
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 11:31:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <527BEA91.6050603@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOesGMgiUbJF01+BPBDgJT3J-Sn6ewE04aMyCTYrwjKwY4S2SQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/07/2013 11:02 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> [ 0.000000] reserving inaccessible SNB gfx pages
>> [ 0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0x00000000000000-0x00000000100000]
This is on a Sandy Bridge system, which I guess I managed to miss the
first time. Unfortunately low memory corruption is expected with SNB
graphics... this is why we unconditionally reserve all low memory on SNB.
>> setup_arch+0xa2d/0xa41
>> [...]
>>
>> Unfortunately x86 doesn't keep the memblock structures around, so
>> there's no way to verify after booting in debugfs, but based on the
>> above it should have been reserved properly.
>
> *prod*
>
> So, got a preference on solution for this? The warning seems harmless
> but still annoying to get used to ignoring false positives, etc.
>
> Disable the low memory checker by default? Hide it behind a debug
> option (runtime or build time)?
>
I'm inclined to say disable it by default, but I'll let Ingo comment.
These days we default to reserving all of low memory other than the
trampoline (which we really can't avoid); leaving it in as a debug
option seems reasonable, but it is really questionable to me how much it
is useful to a general user.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-07 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-17 18:57 Corrupted low memory in v3.9+ Olof Johansson
2013-10-17 19:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-10-17 20:39 ` Olof Johansson
2013-11-07 19:02 ` Olof Johansson
2013-11-07 19:31 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-11-11 11:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-11-11 23:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-12 0:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=527BEA91.6050603@linux.intel.com \
--to=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox