From: Levente Kurusa <levex@linux.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Caizhiyong <caizhiyong@hisilicon.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Wanglin (Albert)" <albert.wanglin@hisilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: Fix compile warning with value uninitialized
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 20:02:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <527E86B9.2050306@linux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131109185741.GW2493@sirena.org.uk>
2013-11-09 19:57 keltezéssel, Mark Brown írta:
> On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 04:34:07PM +0100, Levente Kurusa wrote:
>> 2013-11-09 16:16 keltezéssel, Mark Brown írta:
>
>>>> - int i, ret;
>>>> + int i;
>>>> + int ret = 0;
>>>> bool bypass;
>
>> Wouldn't the following be better?
>
>> int i, ret = 0;
>
>> I think it is more readable.
>
> No, that's not the kernel coding style.
Alright.
>
>>> This sort of fix isn't ideal, it just silences the warning but if the
>>> compiler has spotted a genuine oversight in the function it won't
>>> address it. It's better to include some analysis of why this is a good
>>> fix.
>
>> The only condition when 'ret' is not set is when the num_regs parameter is zero
>> and krealloc doesn't fail. If the above two conditions apply, then
>> the code would return an uninitialized value. However, calling this function with
>> num_regs == 0, would be a waste as it essentially does nothing.
>
> OK, so that should be in the changelog - or there should be an error
> check for num_regs == 0 which might be more helpful.
Adding an explanation into the changelog and editing the patch
in a way so that it adds a check would be the best choice I think.
Cai, can you please do this as part of the patch?
--
Regards,
Levente Kurusa
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-09 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-09 9:49 [PATCH] regmap: Fix compile warning with value uninitialized Caizhiyong
2013-11-09 15:16 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-09 15:34 ` Levente Kurusa
2013-11-09 16:15 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-11-09 18:57 ` Mark Brown
2013-11-09 19:02 ` Levente Kurusa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=527E86B9.2050306@linux.com \
--to=levex@linux.com \
--cc=albert.wanglin@hisilicon.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=caizhiyong@hisilicon.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).