From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755734Ab3KLQsq (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:48:46 -0500 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:15784 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754213Ab3KLQsn (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:48:43 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,686,1378882800"; d="scan'208";a="426314104" Message-ID: <52825BE9.2080605@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:48:41 -0800 From: Arjan van de Ven User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Catalin Marinas CC: Peter Zijlstra , Vincent Guittot , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ingo Molnar , Paul Turner , Morten Rasmussen , Chris Metcalf , Tony Luck , "alex.shi@intel.com" , Preeti U Murthy , linaro-kernel , "len.brown@intel.com" , "l.majewski@samsung.com" , Jonathan Corbet , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Paul McKenney , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v5 00/14] sched: packing tasks References: <1382097147-30088-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <20131111163630.GD26898@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <52810851.4090907@linux.intel.com> <20131111181805.GE29572@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20131111181805.GE29572@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/11/2013 10:18 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > The ordering is based on the actual C-state, so a simple way is to wake > up the CPU in the shallowest C-state. With asymmetric configurations > (big.LITTLE) we have different costs for the same C-state, so this would > come in handy. btw I was considering something else; in practice CPUs will be in the deepest state.. ... at which point I was going to go with some other metrics of what is best from a platform level