From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758841Ab3KMJMN (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Nov 2013 04:12:13 -0500 Received: from intranet.asianux.com ([58.214.24.6]:61767 "EHLO intranet.asianux.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933195Ab3KMJMF (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Nov 2013 04:12:05 -0500 X-Spam-Score: -100.8 Message-ID: <528342E5.2030300@asianux.com> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 17:14:13 +0800 From: Chen Gang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130110 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Richard Weinberger CC: Jeff Dike , Hugh Dickins , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, uml-devel , uml-user Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: um: kernel: skas: mmu: remove pmd_free() and pud_free() for failure processing in init_stub_pte() References: <528308E8.8040203@asianux.com> <52834138.7050005@nod.at> In-Reply-To: <52834138.7050005@nod.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/13/2013 05:07 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 13.11.2013 06:06, schrieb Chen Gang: >> Unfortunately, p?d_alloc() and p?d_free() are not pair!! If p?d_alloc() >> succeed, they may be used, so in the next failure, we have to skip them >> to let exit_mmap() or do_munmap() to process it. >> >> According to "Documentation/vm/locking", 'mm->page_table_lock' is for >> using vma list, so not need it when its related vmas are detached or >> unmapped from using vma list. >> >> The related work flow: >> >> exit_mmap() -> >> unmap_vmas(); /* so not need mm->page_table_lock */ >> free_pgtables(); >> >> do_munmap()-> >> detach_vmas_to_be_unmapped(); /* so not need mm->page_table_lock */ >> unmap_region() -> >> free_pgtables(); >> >> free_pgtables() -> >> free_pgd_range() -> >> free_pud_range() -> >> free_pmd_range() -> >> free_pte_range() -> >> pmd_clear(); >> pte_free_tlb(); >> pud_clear(); >> pmd_free_tlb(); >> pgd_clear(); >> pud_free_tlb(); >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang > > Sounds reasonable to me. > *But* there are patches you from out there that tried to fix similar issues and got reverted later. > Now I'm a bit nervous and want a ACK from mm folks to have this verified. > It's not that I don't trust you, but I really don't trust you. ;-) > OK, thanks. > Thanks, > //richard > > -- Chen Gang