From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Vinayak Kale <vkale@apm.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"patches@apm.com" <patches@apm.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
"jcm@redhat.com" <jcm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] genirq: Add an accessor for IRQ_PER_CPU flag
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:08:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <528387CF.5090105@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1384340725-26073-2-git-send-email-vkale@apm.com>
Hi Vinayak,
On 13/11/13 11:05, Vinayak Kale wrote:
> This patch adds an accessor function for IRQ_PER_CPU flag.
> The accessor function is useful to dertermine whether an IRQ is percpu or not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Kale <vkale@apm.com>
> ---
> include/linux/irqdesc.h | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqdesc.h b/include/linux/irqdesc.h
> index 56fb646..acd8a3f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqdesc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqdesc.h
> @@ -152,6 +152,14 @@ static inline int irq_balancing_disabled(unsigned int irq)
> return desc->status_use_accessors & IRQ_NO_BALANCING_MASK;
> }
>
> +static inline int irq_is_percpu(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> + struct irq_desc *desc;
> +
> + desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> + return (desc && (desc->status_use_accessors & IRQ_PER_CPU)) ? 1 : 0;
I don't think it is worth checking for the validity of "desc" here. All
the other accessors assume that you've not passed a stupid "irq" value.
Simply having
return !!(desc->status_use_accessors & IRQ_PER_CPU);
should be enough.
> +}
> +
> static inline void
> irq_set_lockdep_class(unsigned int irq, struct lock_class_key *class)
> {
>
Cheers,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-13 14:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-13 11:05 [PATCH V2 0/2] genirq: arm64: perf: support for percpu pmu interrupt Vinayak Kale
2013-11-13 11:05 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] genirq: Add an accessor for IRQ_PER_CPU flag Vinayak Kale
2013-11-13 14:08 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2013-11-14 10:31 ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-13 11:05 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] arm64: perf: add support for percpu pmu interrupt Vinayak Kale
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=528387CF.5090105@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@apm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkale@apm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox