public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Vinayak Kale <vkale@apm.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"patches@apm.com" <patches@apm.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	"jcm@redhat.com" <jcm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] genirq: Add an accessor for IRQ_PER_CPU flag
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:08:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <528387CF.5090105@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1384340725-26073-2-git-send-email-vkale@apm.com>

Hi Vinayak,

On 13/11/13 11:05, Vinayak Kale wrote:
> This patch adds an accessor function for IRQ_PER_CPU flag.
> The accessor function is useful to dertermine whether an IRQ is percpu or not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Kale <vkale@apm.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/irqdesc.h |    8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqdesc.h b/include/linux/irqdesc.h
> index 56fb646..acd8a3f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqdesc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqdesc.h
> @@ -152,6 +152,14 @@ static inline int irq_balancing_disabled(unsigned int irq)
>  	return desc->status_use_accessors & IRQ_NO_BALANCING_MASK;
>  }
>  
> +static inline int irq_is_percpu(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> +	struct irq_desc *desc;
> +
> +	desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> +	return (desc && (desc->status_use_accessors & IRQ_PER_CPU)) ? 1 : 0;

I don't think it is worth checking for the validity of "desc" here. All
the other accessors assume that you've not passed a stupid "irq" value.

Simply having
	return !!(desc->status_use_accessors & IRQ_PER_CPU);
should be enough.

> +}
> +
>  static inline void
>  irq_set_lockdep_class(unsigned int irq, struct lock_class_key *class)
>  {
> 

Cheers,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...


  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-13 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-13 11:05 [PATCH V2 0/2] genirq: arm64: perf: support for percpu pmu interrupt Vinayak Kale
2013-11-13 11:05 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] genirq: Add an accessor for IRQ_PER_CPU flag Vinayak Kale
2013-11-13 14:08   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2013-11-14 10:31     ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-13 11:05 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] arm64: perf: add support for percpu pmu interrupt Vinayak Kale

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=528387CF.5090105@arm.com \
    --to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=jcm@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@apm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vkale@apm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox