From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753068Ab3KPUPS (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Nov 2013 15:15:18 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f47.google.com ([74.125.83.47]:51596 "EHLO mail-ee0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752170Ab3KPUPN (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Nov 2013 15:15:13 -0500 Message-ID: <5287D24E.9050401@linux.com> Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 21:15:10 +0100 From: Levente Kurusa Reply-To: Levente Kurusa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Felipe Contreras , Ingo Molnar CC: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] panic: setup panic_timeout early References: <52850B89.10605@linux.com> <52853fe6b0fd9_bf6d31e7c1a@nysa.notmuch> <52861DCB.9020206@linux.com> <20131116174538.GA28829@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2013-11-16 19:46 keltezéssel, Felipe Contreras írta: > On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> * Felipe Contreras wrote: > >> Anyway, the fact that you are argumentative even with Linus gives me >> little hope that you will improve your communication patterns with >> _me_, so I'm personally done arguing with you. > > How am I being argumentative? I avoided all arguments. > >>> You don't want to argue? Then don't argue. Apply the patch. [...] >> >> *Plonk*. > > This is exactly the opposite of what is conducive to less argumentation. > > If you are not going to comment on the patch, then don't say anything. > > The patch is good, and the fact that both you and Linus are avoiding > any comments in the patch itself doesn't speak well for your > intentions to avoid argumentation. > > So I ask you again. Do you see something wrong with the patch? > Yes, you. -- Regards, Levente Kurusa