From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753969Ab3KQPuf (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Nov 2013 10:50:35 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:47049 "EHLO mail-wg0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751996Ab3KQPu2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 Nov 2013 10:50:28 -0500 Message-ID: <5288E5BF.2020608@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 16:50:23 +0100 From: Francis Moreau User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Borislav Petkov CC: LKML Subject: Re: 3.12: kernel panic when resuming from suspend to RAM (x86_64) References: <52888F6D.6000802@gmail.com> <20131117132531.GB27696@pd.tnic> In-Reply-To: <20131117132531.GB27696@pd.tnic> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Le 17/11/2013 14:25, Borislav Petkov a écrit : > On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 10:42:05AM +0100, Francis Moreau wrote: >> Today I got a different behaviour, after resuming I got a >> kernel panic. I could take a picture of the laptop screen: >> http://imgur.com/f5uWFTY > > Does archlinux ship the upstream kernel or do they have patches ontop? > If "yes" to the last one, try reproducing this panic with the upstream > kernel 3.12. AFAIK, the kernel has 2 simple patches on top of the vanilla one. They're both are trivial and can't be related to this issue. You can have look to them here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Kernels#Official_packages > > In general, how reliably can you reproduce the kernel panic with the > upstream 3.12 kernel? > Assuming that I'm running an upstream kernel, it's almost 100% reproductible. Thanks.