From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Andreas Werner <wernerandy@gmx.de>, tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bp@alien8.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] X86: MM: Add PAT Type write-through in combination with mtrr
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2013 18:24:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <528ACBD8.3070804@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383480142-5665-1-git-send-email-wernerandy@gmx.de>
On 11/03/2013 04:02 AM, Andreas Werner wrote:
> Revision 2:
> added comment in code.
>
> This patch adds the Write-through memory type in combination with mtrr.
> If you call ioremap_cache to request cachable memory (write-back) the
> function tries to set the PAT to write-back only if the mtrr setting of
> the requested region is also marked as Write-Back.
>
> If the mttr regions are marked e.g. as Write-through or with other
> types, the function will always return UC- memory.
>
> If you check the Intel document " IA-32 SDM vol 3a table Effective
> Memory Type", there
> are many other combinations possible.
>
> This patch will only add the following combination:
> PAT=Write-Back + MTRR=Write-Through.
>
> Since marking IO Memory as cachable is not valid, WT is the
> best way for caching/bursting on MMIO Devices.
>
> Tested on - Intel (R) Atom E680 (Tunnel Creek)
> - Intel (R) Core(TM)2 Duo
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Werner <wernerandy@gmx.de>
I don't quite know where this ended up, but I am *really* not happy
about going back to using MTRRs to mark I/O devices with the chronic
problems of MTRR exhaustion that entails. As such I do insist that PAT
is properly updated to support WT if we're going to do this.
-hpa
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-19 2:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-03 12:02 [PATCH v2] X86: MM: Add PAT Type write-through in combination with mtrr Andreas Werner
2013-11-03 17:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-11-03 18:14 ` Andreas Werner
2013-11-19 2:24 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=528ACBD8.3070804@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wernerandy@gmx.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox