public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: oleg@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk,
	keescook@chromium.org, mhocko@suse.cz, snanda@chromium.org,
	dserrg@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] kill task_struct->did_exec
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 14:46:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <528FB49E.2000502@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131122175447.GA31463@redhat.com>

(11/22/2013 12:54 PM), Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> We can kill either task->did_exec or PF_FORKNOEXEC, they are
> mutually exclusive. The patch kill ->did_exec because it has
> a single user.

It's ok.

but,

> - * Auch. Had to add the 'did_exec' flag to conform completely to POSIX.
> - * LBT 04.03.94
> + * !PF_FORKNOEXEC check to conform completely to POSIX. LBT 04.03.94.

I guess LBT is his name and !PF_FORKNOEXEC is not his opinion. Please just
remove "LBT 04.03.94" too. git repo still keep his achievement and can avoid
confusion.


  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-22 19:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-22 17:54 [PATCH 0/4] in_exec/etc cleanups Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-22 17:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] check_unsafe_exec: use while_each_thread() rather than next_thread() Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-22 19:42   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-11-22 20:24     ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-22 20:32       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-11-22 17:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] check_unsafe_exec: kill the dead -EAGAIN and clear_in_exec logic Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-22 20:27   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-11-22 20:49     ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-22 21:00       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-11-23 15:32         ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-22 17:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] exec: move the final allow_write_access/fput into free_bprm() Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-22 20:29   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-11-23 19:22   ` Kees Cook
2013-11-22 17:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] kill task_struct->did_exec Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-22 19:46   ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2013-11-22 20:33     ` [PATCH v2 " Oleg Nesterov
2013-11-22 20:33       ` KOSAKI Motohiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=528FB49E.2000502@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dserrg@gmail.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=snanda@chromium.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox