From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756171Ab3KVTqo (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Nov 2013 14:46:44 -0500 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:49121 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755605Ab3KVTqn (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Nov 2013 14:46:43 -0500 Message-ID: <528FB49E.2000502@jp.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 14:46:38 -0500 From: KOSAKI Motohiro User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: oleg@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org CC: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, keescook@chromium.org, mhocko@suse.cz, snanda@chromium.org, dserrg@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] kill task_struct->did_exec References: <20131122175447.GA31463@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20131122175447.GA31463@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (11/22/2013 12:54 PM), Oleg Nesterov wrote: > We can kill either task->did_exec or PF_FORKNOEXEC, they are > mutually exclusive. The patch kill ->did_exec because it has > a single user. It's ok. but, > - * Auch. Had to add the 'did_exec' flag to conform completely to POSIX. > - * LBT 04.03.94 > + * !PF_FORKNOEXEC check to conform completely to POSIX. LBT 04.03.94. I guess LBT is his name and !PF_FORKNOEXEC is not his opinion. Please just remove "LBT 04.03.94" too. git repo still keep his achievement and can avoid confusion.