From: Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@samsung.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@samsung.com>,
"shuahkhan@gmail.com" <shuahkhan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.13-rc1 is out
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:58:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <528FFDB4.3030501@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxK5hkhteiL5cyPtHX5reup6aOiHQTCDKKdBsHiWsroGA@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/22/2013 01:36 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So you had an extra week to prepare your pull requests, and if you
> were planning on sending it in the last two days thinking I'd close
> the merge window on Sunday as usual, I can only laugh derisively in
> your general direction, and call you bad names. Because I'm not
> interested in your excuses. I did warn people about this in the 3.12
> release notes. As it was, there were a few people who cut it fairly
> close today. You know who you are.
>
> If there are pull requests I missed (due to getting caught in spam
> filters, or not matching my normal search patterns), and you think you
> sent your pull request in time but it got overlooked, ping me -
> because I don't have anything pending I know about, but mistakes
> happen.
>
> Talking about mistakes... I suspect it was a mistake to have that
> extra week before the merge window opened, and I probably should just
> have done a 3.12-rc8 instead. Because the linux-next statistics look
> suspicious, and we had extra stuff show up there not just in that
> first week. Clearly people took that "let's have an extra week of
> merge window" and extrapolated it a bit too much. Oh, well. Live and
> learn.
>
> Anyway, other than that small oddity, this was a fairly normal merge
> window. By patch size we had a pretty usual ~55% drivers, 18%
> architecture code, 9% network updates, and the rest is spread out (fs,
> headers, tools, documentation). Featurewise, the big ones are likely
> the nftables and the multi-queue block layer stuff, but depending on
> your interests you might find all the incremental updates to various
> areas interesting. There are some odd ones in there (LE mode Powerpc
> support..)
>
> Go forth and test, and start sending me regression fixes. And really,
> if you didn't send me your pull request in time, don't whine about it.
> Because nobody likes a whiner.
>
3.13-rc1 fails to boot on Samsung Series 9. 3.12.1 is fine and the last
mainline kernel that worked on it was from Nov 14th. It failed to mount
/boot and after doing a manually mounting it, it came up and didn't
detect USB mouse. Looking at the dmesg differences in dmesg, looks like
usb probe fails on USB mouse. I will start a bisect and let you know
what I find.
dmesg 3.13-rc1:
63.637083] PM: Adding info for usb:2-1:1.0
[ 63.637128] driver: '2-1': driver_bound: bound to device 'usb'
[ 63.637136] bus: 'usb': really_probe: bound device 2-1 to driver usb
[ 123.660457] usb 2-1: USB disconnect, device number 3
[ 123.660505] bus: 'usb': remove device 2-1:1.0
[ 123.660508] PM: Removing info for usb:2-1:1.0
[ 123.661718] bus: 'usb': remove device 2-1
[ 123.661724] PM: Removing info for usb:2-1
[ 125.143833] usb 2-1: new low-speed USB device number 4 using xhci_hcd
[ 125.190924] usb 2-1: New USB device found, idVendor=17ef, idProduct=6019
[ 125.190928] usb 2-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=0, Product=2,
SerialNumber=0
[ 125.190930] usb 2-1: Product: Lenovo Optical USB Mouse
[ 125.191042] bus: 'usb': add device 2-1
[ 125.191054] PM: Adding info for usb:2-1
[ 125.191081] bus: 'usb': driver_probe_device: matched device 2-1 with
driver usb
[ 125.191084] bus: 'usb': really_probe: probing driver usb with device 2-1
[ 125.191097] usb 2-1: ep 0x81 - rounding interval to 64 microframes,
ep desc says 80 microframes
[ 125.201952] bus: 'usb': add device 2-1:1.0
[ 125.201959] PM: Adding info for usb:2-1:1.0
[ 125.202010] driver: '2-1': driver_bound: bound to device 'usb'
[ 125.202019] bus: 'usb': really_probe: bound device 2-1 to driver usb
dmesg 3.12.1:
[ 5.562700] bus: 'usb': add driver usbhid
[ 5.562790] bus: 'usb': driver_probe_device: matched device 2-1:1.0
with driv
er usbhid
[ 5.562794] bus: 'usb': really_probe: probing driver usbhid with
device 2-1:1
.0
[ 5.575965] driver: '2-1:1.0': driver_bound: bound to device 'usbhid'
[ 5.575971] bus: 'usb': really_probe: bound device 2-1:1.0 to driver
usbhid
[ 5.575998] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbhid
[ 5.576000] usbhid: USB HID core driver
[ 5.601326] input: Lenovo Optical USB Mouse as
/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1c.4/0000:03:00.0/usb2/2-1/2-1:1.0/input/input6
[ 5.601796] hid-generic 0003:17EF:6019.0001: input,hidraw0: USB HID
v1.11 Mouse [Lenovo Optical USB Mouse] on usb-0000:03:00.0-1/input0
[ 5.670722] bus: 'usb': add driver btusb
[ 5.670736] bus: 'usb': driver_probe_device: matched device 1-1.5:1.0
with driver btusb
[ 5.670739] bus: 'usb': really_probe: probing driver btusb with
device 1-1.5:1.0
-- Shuah
--
Shuah Khan
Senior Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group
Samsung Research America(Silicon Valley)
shuah.kh@samsung.com | (970) 672-0658
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-23 0:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-22 20:36 Linux 3.13-rc1 is out Linus Torvalds
2013-11-23 0:43 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-11-23 1:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-11-23 0:51 ` James Cloos
2013-11-23 2:32 ` Jongman Heo
2013-11-23 0:58 ` Shuah Khan [this message]
2013-11-25 0:10 ` linux-next stats (Was: Linux 3.13-rc1 is out) Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=528FFDB4.3030501@samsung.com \
--to=shuah.kh@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuahkhan@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox