From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750987Ab3KXFAr (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Nov 2013 00:00:47 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-f170.google.com ([209.85.192.170]:36537 "EHLO mail-pd0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750701Ab3KXFAn (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Nov 2013 00:00:43 -0500 Message-ID: <529187EE.4010304@linaro.org> Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 13:00:30 +0800 From: Alex Shi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Lezcano , mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, tony.luck@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, arjan@linux.intel.com, pjt@google.com, fengguang.wu@intel.com CC: james.hogan@imgtec.com, jason.low2@hp.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] sched: remove cpu_load decay. References: <1385102235-25664-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linaro.org> <528F4A78.1080505@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <528F4A78.1080505@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/22/2013 08:13 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> >> The git tree for this patchset at: >> git@github.com:alexshi/power-scheduling.git no-load-idx >> Since Fengguang had included this tree into his kernel testing system. >> and I haven't get a regression report until now. I suppose it is fine >> for x86 system. >> >> But anyway, since the scheduler change will effect all archs. and >> hackbench is only benchmark I found now for this patchset. I'd like to >> see more testing and talking on this patchset. > > Hi Alex, > > I tried on my Xeon server (2 x 4 cores) your patchset and got the > following result: > > kernel a5d6e63323fe7799eb0e6 / + patchset > > hackbench -T -s 4096 -l 1000 -g 10 -f 40 > 27.604 38.556 Thanks for your testing, Daniel! Fengguang, how about your kernel results for this patchset? -- Thanks Alex