linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@gmail.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>,
	"'Borislav Petkov'" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"'Wei WANG'" <wei_wang@realsil.com.cn>,
	"'LKML'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"'Samuel Ortiz'" <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
	"'Chris Ball'" <cjb@laptop.org>
Subject: Re: 3.12: kernel panic when resuming from suspend to RAM (x86_64)
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 08:42:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5292FF5D.1050304@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4523614.I5MBhorHFt@vostro.rjw.lan>

On 11/24/2013 10:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, November 24, 2013 10:39:20 AM Francis Moreau wrote:
>> Hello Thomas
>>
>> On 11/22/2013 11:27 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Fri, 22 Nov 2013, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>> On Friday, November 22, 2013 10:36:23 PM Francis Moreau wrote:
>>>>> Ok, I've finally managed to find out the bad commit:
>>>>> ad07277e82dedabacc52c82746633680a3187d25: ACPI / PM: Hold acpi_scan_lock
>>>>> over system PM transitions
>>>>>
>>>>> I verified that the parent commit doesn't have the problem.
>>>>
>>>> Interesting.
>>>>
>>>>> Rafael, you're the man now ;)
>>>>
>>>> I kind of don't see how that commit may result in behavior that you
>>>> described earlier in the thread.
>>>>
>>>> You get a memory corruption that seems to have started to happen because
>>>> we're holding an additional lock over suspend resume now.  Something's fishy
>>>> on that machine and we need to figure out what it is.
>>>
>>> The hickup happens in the timer softirq.
>>>
>>> @Francis: Did you try to enable DEBUG_OBJECTS.*. If not please give it
>>> 	  a try.
>>
>> This looks like it was a good idea.
>>
>> The kernel now outputs the following traces after resuming.
>>
>> [   26.973928] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 4 at lib/debugobjects.c:260
>> debug_print_object+0x83/0xa0()
>> [   26.973932] ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object type:
>> timer_list hint: delayed_work_timer_fn+0x0/0x20
>> [   26.973972] Modules linked in: x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp
>> rtsx_pci_ms coretemp memstick kvm_intel i2c_i801 iTCO_wdt
>> iTCO_vendor_support i915 i2c_algo_bit intel_agp intel_gtt drm_kms_helper
>> r8169 drm kvm mii agpgart i2c_core lpc_ich ac shpchp crc32c_intel
>> battery thermal wmi evdev mei_me video mei button mperf processor
>> serio_raw microcode ext4 crc16 mbcache jbd2 sr_mod cdrom sd_mod
>> usb_storage rtsx_pci_sdmmc mmc_core ahci libahci libata ehci_pci
>> ehci_hcd xhci_hcd scsi_mod rtsx_pci usbcore usb_common
>> [   26.974013] CPU: 0 PID: 4 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted
>> 3.11.0-rc2-ARCH #64
>> [   26.974014] Hardware name: CLEVO CO.                        W55xEU
>>                        /W55xEU                          , BIOS 4.6.5
>> 03/05/2013
>> [   26.974019] Workqueue: kacpi_hotplug hotplug_event_work
>> [   26.974020]  0000000000000009 ffff880407d0da18 ffffffff81459fe9
>> ffff880407d0da60
>> [   26.974023]  ffff880407d0da50 ffffffff8104dc7d ffff880407fad488
>> ffffffff81836fc0
>> [   26.974025]  ffffffff81701358 ffffffff81afef70 0000000000000003
>> ffff880407d0dab0
>> [   26.974027] Call Trace:
>> [   26.974031]  [<ffffffff81459fe9>] dump_stack+0x54/0x8d
>> [   26.974043]  [<ffffffff8104dc7d>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7d/0xa0
>> [   26.974044]  [<ffffffff8104dcec>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4c/0x50
>> [   26.974047]  [<ffffffff81261433>] debug_print_object+0x83/0xa0
>> [   26.974050]  [<ffffffff8106b820>] ? queue_work_on+0x50/0x50
>> [   26.974053]  [<ffffffff81261c2b>] __debug_check_no_obj_freed+0x1fb/0x240
>> [   26.974059]  [<ffffffffa008e959>] ? rtsx_pci_remove+0x119/0x1d0
>> [rtsx_pci]
> 
> So a device driven by rtsx_pcr.c is removed after resume.  Without the commit
> you've bisected it is removed as well, but that happens during resume, so
> rtsx_pci_resume() is likely not called in that case.

I'm not sure to understand your point.

> 
> I bet that there's a bug either in rtsx_pci_remove() or in rtsx_pci_resume().
> The latter definitely should check if the device is actually still present
> before scheduling the delayed work, but then the Boris' patch should take care
> of that anyway.
> 

With Boris' patch applied, I still have the problem.

Thanks.


  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-25  7:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-17  9:42 3.12: kernel panic when resuming from suspend to RAM (x86_64) Francis Moreau
2013-11-17 13:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-17 15:50   ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-17 16:01     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-17 18:02       ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-17 19:53         ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-17 20:49           ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-17 22:06             ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-17 22:34               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-17 22:46                 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-18 12:21                   ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-18 12:20                 ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-18  0:33               ` Kevin Easton
2013-11-18  1:04                 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-18  2:43                   ` Kevin Easton
2013-11-18 12:19               ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-18 13:32                 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-19 10:01                   ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-19 10:15                     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-20  9:45                       ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-20 11:15                         ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-21  8:22                           ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-21 10:12                             ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-21 11:17                               ` Jingoo Han
2013-11-21 13:07                                 ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-22  7:43                                 ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-22  9:57                                   ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-22 12:54                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-22 21:36                                       ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-22 22:08                                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-22 22:27                                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-24  9:39                                             ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-24 13:31                                               ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-24 21:06                                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-25  7:42                                                 ` Francis Moreau [this message]
2013-11-25 10:47                                                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-11-29  8:28                                                     ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-29  9:02                                                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-30 15:07                                                         ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-30 20:17                                                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-01 10:11                                                             ` Francis Moreau
2013-12-01 19:26                                                             ` Francis Moreau
2013-12-02 10:49                                                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-12-02 11:20                                                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-12-03  8:14                                                               ` Francis Moreau
2013-12-09 19:33                                                                 ` Francis Moreau
2013-12-09 22:27                                                                   ` Samuel Ortiz
2013-12-09 22:17                                                                 ` Samuel Ortiz
2013-12-10  1:39                                                                   ` wwang
2013-12-10  1:56                                                                     ` micky
2013-12-10  8:29                                                                       ` Samuel Ortiz
2014-01-10  7:26                                                                         ` Francis Moreau
2014-01-10  9:16                                                                           ` micky
2014-01-10  9:52                                                                           ` Samuel Ortiz
2014-01-10 10:07                                                                             ` Francis Moreau
2013-12-10 10:50                                                                       ` Francis Moreau
2013-12-17  8:03                                                                       ` Francis Moreau
2013-12-18  4:05                                                                         ` micky
2013-12-18  8:12                                                                           ` Francis Moreau
2013-12-20  1:30                                                                             ` micky
2013-12-20  2:28                                                                               ` Jingoo Han
2013-12-10 10:49                                                                   ` Francis Moreau
2013-11-24  9:42                                           ` Francis Moreau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5292FF5D.1050304@gmail.com \
    --to=francis.moro@gmail.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wei_wang@realsil.com.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).