From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dsahern@gmail.com,
jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, acme@ghostprotocols.net,
mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf util: Join four conditions in two in perf_evlist__create_maps().
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 12:49:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5295CE48.4090501@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <529677A2.6040304@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 28/11/13 00:52, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> On 11/27/2013 04:43 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 28/11/13 00:23, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
>>> There are four condition branchs in perf_evlist__create_maps, but they
>>> only do two kinds of thing. 1st and 4th call cpu_map__new(), and the others
>>> call cpu_map__dummy_new(). This patch joins them in two branchs, decreasing
>>> the number of branch and removing some duplicated code.
>> That code has changed again. See:
>>
>> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/log/?h=perf/core
>>
>>
>
> Hi Adrian!
> Thanx for your reminding. Yes, a more checking is added into the 1st
> branch.
> And I think we still can join them in two conditions.
>
> Do you think this idea is ok to you? If so, I will update my patch base on
> the latest code.
Personally I like code that is easy to read, and I don't think
combining the conditions does that. But you could set a bool
and use that to decide what to call.
>
> Yang
>>> Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>>> ---
>>> tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 8 +++-----
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
>>> index bbc746a..2258eb4 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
>>> @@ -819,11 +819,9 @@ int perf_evlist__create_maps(struct perf_evlist
>>> *evlist, struct target *target)
>>> if (evlist->threads == NULL)
>>> return -1;
>>> - if (target->force_per_cpu)
>>> - evlist->cpus = cpu_map__new(target->cpu_list);
>>> - else if (target__has_task(target))
>>> - evlist->cpus = cpu_map__dummy_new();
>>> - else if (!target__has_cpu(target) && !target->uses_mmap)
>>> + if (!target->force_per_cpu &&
>>> + (target__has_task(target) ||
>>> + (!target__has_cpu(target) && !target->uses_mmap)))
>>> evlist->cpus = cpu_map__dummy_new();
>>> else
>>> evlist->cpus = cpu_map__new(target->cpu_list);
>>>
>>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-27 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-27 22:23 [PATCH] perf util: Join four conditions in two in perf_evlist__create_maps() Dongsheng Yang
2013-11-27 9:43 ` Adrian Hunter
2013-11-27 22:52 ` Dongsheng Yang
2013-11-27 10:49 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2013-11-28 0:36 ` Dongsheng Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5295CE48.4090501@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox