From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754829Ab3K0Lwq (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Nov 2013 06:52:46 -0500 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:40677 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751845Ab3K0Lwl (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Nov 2013 06:52:41 -0500 Message-ID: <5295DCB9.7030708@ti.com> Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:51:21 +0200 From: "ivan.khoronzhuk" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Norris CC: Santosh Shilimkar , Rob Landley , Russell King , Mark Rutland , , , Pawel Moll , Stephen Warren , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Rob Herring , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Reuse davinci-nand driver for Keystone arch References: <1385033305-13179-1-git-send-email-ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com> <20131127013309.GT9468@ld-irv-0074.broadcom.com> In-Reply-To: <20131127013309.GT9468@ld-irv-0074.broadcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.167.145.122] X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: f9c360f5-3d1e-4c3c-8703-f45bf52eff6b Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/27/2013 03:33 AM, Brian Norris wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 01:28:15PM +0200, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote: >> This series contains fixes and updates of Davinci nand driver in >> order to reuse it for Keystone platform. >> >> The series is combination of two following series: >> - Davinci nand driver fixes and updates: >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/20/271 >> - Reuse davinci-nand driver for Keystone arch >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/20/315 > > Can you make sure to consistently change the email $subject for your > patch series? For each of the above, it looks like they are actually > version 2, yet they still just say "[PATCH X/Y]" (not "[PATCH v2 X/Y]"). > This makes it harder to parse the history of each series. (And the > combining of two un-versioned patch series adds to the confusion.) > > Now, this combined series has a good v2 marking (although at this point, > is it really v3? ...whatever, it doesn't matter). Please continue to > write appropriate $subjects for this and future patch series. > > Thanks, > Brian > Sorry for the mess, I will -- Regards, Ivan Khoronzhuk