From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-parport@lists.infradead.org,
Maximilian Attems <maks@stro.at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] parport: parport_pc: remove double PCI ID for NetMos
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 11:35:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52971C5F.7040307@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131127135322.49ea91c23db4879f97b524f0@linux-foundation.org>
On 11/27/2013 10:53 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> While here I also drop the entry for titan_1284p2 which is the same as
>> netmos_9815.
>
> Does this change have any runtime-visible effects?
Titan p2 used to specify class + subclass which is now replaced with
PCI_ID_ANY, I doubt this makes any difference at all.
The only runtime visible change I notice is with KERN_DEBUG being
visible. The card details are the same, it always prints
|parport1: PC-style at 0xc120 (0xc128), irq 11, using FIFO
[PCSPP,TRISTATE,COMPAT,ECP]
However the ID that was used to detect the card is different:
| PCI parallel port detected: 1415:c118, I/O at 0xc120(0xc128), IRQ 11
vs
| PCI parallel port detected: 9710:9805, I/O at 0xc120(0xc128), IRQ 11
The wrong id print is printed for all devices which come after
PCI_DEVICE_ID_OXSEMI_PCIe840_G in the id table because the code that
prints the ID table assumes one id per entry.
So we could
- drop printk
- use id->vendor + id->device instead
- do the last item + remove parport_pc_pci_cards and pass the data
struct as data.
- nothing
any preferences?
Sebastian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-28 10:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-27 16:43 [PATCH] parport: parport_pc: remove double PCI ID for NetMos Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2013-11-27 21:53 ` Andrew Morton
2013-11-28 10:35 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [this message]
2013-12-02 21:44 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52971C5F.7040307@linutronix.de \
--to=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parport@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maks@stro.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox