From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752228Ab3K2IKu (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Nov 2013 03:10:50 -0500 Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:51807 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751128Ab3K2IKq (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Nov 2013 03:10:46 -0500 Message-ID: <52984BAF.4060306@ti.com> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:39:19 +0530 From: Sekhar Nori User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Walleij CC: Grygorii Strashko , Prabhakar Lad , LKML , DLOS , LAK , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Stephen Warren , Ian Campbell , Rob Landley , Grant Likely Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/6] gpio: davinci: add OF support References: <1385057731-4348-1-git-send-email-prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> <1385057731-4348-5-git-send-email-prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> <52932DB9.4090805@ti.com> <5294950A.9070007@ti.com> <5294D692.3080100@ti.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 29 November 2013 01:16 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On Tuesday 26 November 2013 06:03 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > >>> Actually, the same was proposed by Linus, but we've tried avoid such huge rework - >>> by switching to one irq_domain per all banks for example. >> >> I didn't really read that proposal from Linus so if two people >> independently suggested the same thing, there must be something worth >> considering there :) > > From a GPIO POV it's not such a big deal really, this approach is fine > and the important thing is that we progress toward a more standard > driver... it's more a question for the DT people IMO. I really like the > current patch set. Rob has acked v5 of this patch. So no objection from DT people too. My concern was a bit futuristic. Since everyone is happy I think we can go with the current patch itself. Thanks, Sekhar