From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>
To: <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
<xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <jonathan.davies@citrix.com>,
<paul.durrant@citrix.com>
Cc: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: Fix pull size in checksum_setup_ip*
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 20:26:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5298F867.3030200@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1385751407-9365-1-git-send-email-zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>
Or would it make sense to drop header_size and use off + something as
function parameters?
Zoli
On 29/11/13 18:56, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> Before checksum setup we need to make sure we have enough data in linear
> buffer, so we do a pull if not. The calculation of the required data counts
> with skb->network_header, which is the headroom size actually. This is not
> necessary, and can cause unreasonable pulling. I've also removed
> MAX_IPOPTLEN, as we only need the base header at that point.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@citrix.com>
>
> ---
> drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c | 24 ++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> index 919b650..adadf76 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> @@ -1169,8 +1169,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ip(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb,
>
> off = sizeof(struct iphdr);
>
> - header_size = skb->network_header + off + MAX_IPOPTLEN;
> - maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size);
> + maybe_pull_tail(skb, off);
>
> off = iph->ihl * 4;
>
> @@ -1183,8 +1182,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ip(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb,
> if (recalculate_partial_csum) {
> struct tcphdr *tcph = tcp_hdr(skb);
>
> - header_size = skb->network_header +
> - off +
> + header_size = off +
> sizeof(struct tcphdr);
> maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size);
>
> @@ -1201,8 +1199,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ip(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb,
> if (recalculate_partial_csum) {
> struct udphdr *udph = udp_hdr(skb);
>
> - header_size = skb->network_header +
> - off +
> + header_size = off +
> sizeof(struct udphdr);
> maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size);
>
> @@ -1241,8 +1238,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb,
>
> off = sizeof(struct ipv6hdr);
>
> - header_size = skb->network_header + off;
> - maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size);
> + maybe_pull_tail(skb, off);
>
> nexthdr = ipv6h->nexthdr;
>
> @@ -1254,8 +1250,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb,
> case IPPROTO_ROUTING: {
> struct ipv6_opt_hdr *hp = (void *)(skb->data + off);
>
> - header_size = skb->network_header +
> - off +
> + header_size = off +
> sizeof(struct ipv6_opt_hdr);
> maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size);
>
> @@ -1266,8 +1261,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb,
> case IPPROTO_AH: {
> struct ip_auth_hdr *hp = (void *)(skb->data + off);
>
> - header_size = skb->network_header +
> - off +
> + header_size = off +
> sizeof(struct ip_auth_hdr);
> maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size);
>
> @@ -1305,8 +1299,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb,
> if (recalculate_partial_csum) {
> struct tcphdr *tcph = tcp_hdr(skb);
>
> - header_size = skb->network_header +
> - off +
> + header_size = off +
> sizeof(struct tcphdr);
> maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size);
>
> @@ -1324,8 +1317,7 @@ static int checksum_setup_ipv6(struct xenvif *vif, struct sk_buff *skb,
> if (recalculate_partial_csum) {
> struct udphdr *udph = udp_hdr(skb);
>
> - header_size = skb->network_header +
> - off +
> + header_size = off +
> sizeof(struct udphdr);
> maybe_pull_tail(skb, header_size);
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-29 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-29 18:56 [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: Fix pull size in checksum_setup_ip* Zoltan Kiss
2013-11-29 20:26 ` Zoltan Kiss [this message]
2013-12-02 9:42 ` Paul Durrant
2013-11-30 21:10 ` David Miller
2013-12-02 13:04 ` Paul Durrant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5298F867.3030200@citrix.com \
--to=zoltan.kiss@citrix.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jonathan.davies@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox