From: Chris Ruehl <chris.ruehl@gtsys.com.hk>
To: Michael Grzeschik <mgr@pengutronix.de>
Cc: alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 v2] usb: chipidea: Fix Internal error: : 808 [#1] ARM related to STS flag
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 11:04:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <529955D5.7040908@gtsys.com.hk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131129182812.GF3516@pengutronix.de>
On Saturday, November 30, 2013 02:28 AM, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 03:19:45PM +0800, Chris Ruehl wrote:
>> usb: chipidea: Fix Internal error: : 808 [#1] ARM related to STS flag
>>
>> * init the sts flag to 0 (missed)
>> * set the sts flag only if not 0
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Ruehl<chris.ruehl@gtsys.com.hk>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c | 8 ++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
>> index 5075407..1a6010e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/core.c
>> @@ -245,6 +245,8 @@ static void hw_phymode_configure(struct ci_hdrc *ci)
>> {
>> u32 portsc, lpm, sts = 0;
>>
>> switch (ci->platdata->phy_mode) {
>> case USBPHY_INTERFACE_MODE_UTMI:
>> portsc = PORTSC_PTS(PTS_UTMI);
>> @@ -273,10 +275,12 @@ static void hw_phymode_configure(struct ci_hdrc *ci)
>>
>> if (ci->hw_bank.lpm) {
>> hw_write(ci, OP_DEVLC, DEVLC_PTS(7) | DEVLC_PTW, lpm);
>> - hw_write(ci, OP_DEVLC, DEVLC_STS, sts);
>> + if (sts)
>> + hw_write(ci, OP_DEVLC, DEVLC_STS, sts);
>> } else {
>> hw_write(ci, OP_PORTSC, PORTSC_PTS(7) | PORTSC_PTW, portsc);
>> - hw_write(ci, OP_PORTSC, PORTSC_STS, sts);
>> + if ( sts )
>> + hw_write(ci, OP_PORTSC, PORTSC_STS, sts);
>
> The conditions coding style is broken.
>
>> }
>> }
>
> Still don't get why a system with ehci compliant PORTSC register
> should not want to have the sts bit _explicitly_ set to 0 if
> we don't use serial phy mode. So NACK!
>
> Michael
>
Guys,,, I must be blind
hw_write(ci, OP_PORTSC, PORTSC_STS, sts);
sts has a wrong value, its should be (sts << 29) when sts = 1
same for lpm value (lpm << 28)
Still needs to check the value of PTS, if PTS > 1 or sts flag is read only.
if (ci->hw_bank.lpm) {
hw_write(ci, OP_DEVLC, DEVLC_PTS(7) | DEVLC_PTW, lpm);
if ( sts )
hw_write(ci, OP_DEVLC, DEVLC_STS, BIT(28));
else
hw_write(ci, OP_DEVLC, DEVLC_STS, ~BIT(28));
} else {
hw_write(ci, OP_PORTSC, PORTSC_PTS(7) | PORTSC_PTW, portsc);
if (((portsc >> 30) & 0x3) > 1) { /* check if STS is read only */
if (sts) {
hw_write(ci, OP_PORTSC, PORTSC_STS, BIT(29));
}
else {
portsc = (ioread32(ci->hw_bank.regmap[OP_PORTSC])
& BIT(29));
if (portsc) /* sts needs reset */
hw_write(ci, OP_PORTSC, PORTSC_STS,
~BIT(29));
}
}
}
With a write to an already sts = 0 my kernel oops 808. so check if the sts is 0
and if 0 then no write.
Can someone have a look for the lpm stuff ?
Michael, thanks for the NOACK ;-) otherwise
Regards
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-30 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-29 7:19 [PATCH 2/3 v2] usb: chipidea: Fix Internal error: : 808 [#1] ARM related to STS flag Chris Ruehl
2013-11-29 8:44 ` Peter Chen
2013-11-29 18:28 ` Michael Grzeschik
2013-11-30 1:18 ` Chris Ruehl
2013-11-30 1:33 ` Chris Ruehl
2013-11-30 3:04 ` Chris Ruehl [this message]
2013-11-30 10:14 ` Peter Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=529955D5.7040908@gtsys.com.hk \
--to=chris.ruehl@gtsys.com.hk \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgr@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox