From: Levente Kurusa <levex@linux.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, EDAC <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: mcheck: call put_device on device_register failure
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 12:44:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5299CFBB.4010209@linux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131130113229.GD4323@pd.tnic>
2013-11-30 12:32, Borislav Petkov:
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 12:25:44PM +0100, Levente Kurusa wrote:
>> Now this tree makes me wonder if there are devices where the author
>> forgot to set a device_release or when the put_device is not called. I
>> will take a look into this.
>
> kobject_cleanup() warns about !t->release already.
Yes, I saw that as well. By that I meant that by doing some identifier searches
for device_register and then checking whether they call put_device and have device_release
registered. Also, I wonder if it would be beneficial to have a generic device_release? Most
of the drivers I quickly swept through only call kfree(). Wouldn't a generic one save
some space?
>
> If you want to fix actual issues and not waste time with potential
> issues which have never actually triggered, try building a couple of
> randconfigs and look at the output :-)
Yes, I do that daily usually, but most of the time I only get some uninitialized warnings. :-)
>
> Also, we have "make W=" which gives you even more :-)
What does that do? Never heard of it yet.
--
Regards,
Levente Kurusa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-30 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-29 20:28 [PATCH] x86: mcheck: call put_device on device_register failure Levente Kurusa
2013-11-29 20:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-30 7:30 ` Levente Kurusa
2013-11-30 11:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-30 11:25 ` Levente Kurusa
2013-11-30 11:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-30 11:44 ` Levente Kurusa [this message]
2013-11-30 12:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-11-30 12:37 ` Levente Kurusa
2013-12-03 2:23 ` Chen, Gong
2013-12-03 17:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-12-04 7:38 ` Chen, Gong
2013-12-04 18:39 ` Levente Kurusa
2013-12-05 2:57 ` Chen, Gong
2013-12-05 11:18 ` Levente Kurusa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5299CFBB.4010209@linux.com \
--to=levex@linux.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox