From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752103Ab3LAWhj (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Dec 2013 17:37:39 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-f180.google.com ([209.85.192.180]:34268 "EHLO mail-pd0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751412Ab3LAWhh (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Dec 2013 17:37:37 -0500 Message-ID: <529BBA2B.3080408@samsung.com> Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 07:37:31 +0900 From: Kukjin Kim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chander Kashyap CC: Kukjin Kim , Tomasz Figa , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , "t.figa@samsung.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Kukjin Kim , Thomas Abraham , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] irqchip: exynos-combiner: remove hard-coded irq_base value References: <1379937815-21746-1-git-send-email-chander.kashyap@linaro.org> <02c701ceba75$f95b1900$ec114b00$@org> <1949846.N3fAUHQ1Nx@flatron> <526444E5.5000405@samsung.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 11/25/13 15:37, Chander Kashyap wrote: > Hi Kikjin, > Hi Chander, > On 21 October 2013 02:32, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> On 10/18/13 02:53, Tomasz Figa wrote: >>> >>> Hi Kukjin, >>> >>> On Thursday 26 of September 2013 14:05:09 Kukjin Kim wrote: >>>> >>>> Chander Kashyap wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Replace irq_domain_add_simple with "irq_domain_add_linear" in order to >>>>> use linear irq domain, and to remove hardcoded irq_base_value. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap >>>>> --- >>>>> >>>>> Changes since v1: >>>>> - Replaced irq_domain_add_simple with irq_domain_add_linear, >>>>> >>>>> as suggested by Tomasz >>>>> >>>>> drivers/irqchip/exynos-combiner.c | 15 +++------------ >>>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) >>> >>> [snip] >>>> >>>> >>>> Looks nice to me, applied with Tomasz's review. >>> >>> >>> I don't see this patch in your tree. Did you apply it in the end? >>> >> Thanks for your gentle reminder. > > I still can not see these patches in yours branches ? > Oops, sorry for missing. This should be queued in next. Thanks. Kukjin