From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf report: Add --show-time-info option
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 13:22:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <529CEBF1.4050004@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131202201705.GE17149@ghostprotocols.net>
On 12/2/13, 1:17 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Probably, yeah, Ingo made some point about using --show- for some reason,
> Ingo?
>
> One I can think of is that, in general, plain --feature can mean, at
> least, one of --enable-feature and --show-feature, so perhaps that is
> the point.
>
> But then, perhaps that may be implied by the context, i.e. when
> recording, --feature means enable it, while when reporting, what we're
> doing is basically_showing_ things, so --feature means just that.
exactly. perf has just --call-graph for both record and report, not
enable-call-graph and show-call-graph.
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-02 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-02 19:23 [PATCH 3/3] perf report: Add --show-time-info option Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-12-02 19:25 ` David Ahern
2013-12-02 19:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-12-02 19:58 ` David Ahern
2013-12-02 20:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-12-02 20:22 ` David Ahern [this message]
2013-12-04 10:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-04 12:57 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-12-02 6:53 [RFC 0/3] perf tools: Show time info (v1) Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02 6:53 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf report: Add --show-time-info option Namhyung Kim
2013-12-02 12:33 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2013-12-02 14:38 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=529CEBF1.4050004@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox