From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753314Ab3LCLmI (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Dec 2013 06:42:08 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-f180.google.com ([209.85.192.180]:38324 "EHLO mail-pd0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751902Ab3LCLmG (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Dec 2013 06:42:06 -0500 Message-ID: <529DC389.6060102@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 19:42:01 +0800 From: Chen Gang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rkuo CC: James Bottomley , Bart Van Assche , Bottomley@parallels.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: scsi: scsi_lib.c: add prefix "SCSILIB_" to macro "SP" References: <528AEFB7.4060301@gmail.com> <20131125011938.GB18921@codeaurora.org> <5292B845.3010404@gmail.com> <5292B8A0.7020409@gmail.com> <5294255E.7040105@gmail.com> <52955913.3060809@gmail.com> <529B60FF.7030601@acm.org> <529BD584.7060504@gmail.com> <1385945387.20150.2.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> <529C5D89.8050809@gmail.com> <20131202213243.GA20646@codeaurora.org> In-Reply-To: <20131202213243.GA20646@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/03/2013 05:32 AM, rkuo wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 06:14:33PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote: >> If one issue occurs, normally, both sides need improvement. >> >> For our issue: >> >> - need try to keep uapi no touch ("arch/hexagon/uapi/asm/registers.h"). >> >> - improving our module is much easier than improving hexagon. >> >> - for 'SP', it is really short enough to like a register name. >> SG_POOL seems more suitable for our 'sgpool' related operations. >> >> >> It will be better to improve hexagon too, but it is not quit easy (maybe >> have to bear it), it is uapi :-( > > I can't speak for SCSI, but that define in Hexagon isn't really used outside > of that file anyways (the two SP macros themselves). I'm also pretty sure > the userspace isn't currently using it anyways. Seeing as it's not really > buying us anything, I'm fine with just removing it and continuing to review > the other defines. I'll make that change and test it locally. > OK, thanks. > > Thanks, > Richard Kuo > > -- Chen Gang