From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754802Ab3LCSLM (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Dec 2013 13:11:12 -0500 Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:22796 "EHLO userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754622Ab3LCSLH (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Dec 2013 13:11:07 -0500 Message-ID: <529E1F47.50107@oracle.com> Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:13:27 -0500 From: Boris Ostrovsky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130805 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tony.luck@intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com CC: xen-devel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: IA64 on Xen support Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tony, Fenghua, We had a discussion at the last Xen Summit about status of Linux' IA64 Xen. Xen itself dropped IA64 support in 4.2 (it is approaching 4.4 now) and it's not clear whether we can even build Linux/Xen/IA64 against latest Xen sources, let alone run it. The proposal at the summit was to remove Xen-related bits from IA64 in Linux. Any objections to this? Thanks. -boris