From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932799Ab3LDQk1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Dec 2013 11:40:27 -0500 Received: from service87.mimecast.com ([91.220.42.44]:42750 "EHLO service87.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755669Ab3LDQkY convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Dec 2013 11:40:24 -0500 Message-ID: <529F5ACF.7010105@arm.com> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 16:39:43 +0000 From: Jonathan Austin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130804 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Austin CC: Ming Lei , "stable@vger.kernel.org" , Rusty Russell , Russell King , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: default PHYS_OFFSET if !MMU References: <1384341351-4110-1-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com> <1384341351-4110-2-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com> <528366A9.7060504@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <528366A9.7060504@arm.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Dec 2013 16:40:22.0208 (UTC) FILETIME=[8667DC00:01CEF10F] X-MC-Unique: 113120416402210401 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, On 13/11/13 11:46, Jonathan Austin wrote: > Hi Ming, > > On 13/11/13 11:15, Ming Lei wrote: >> From: Jonathan Austin >> >> Set CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET as PHYS_OFFSET when !MMU so that >> we can keep CONFIG_PAGE_OFFSET same with PAGE_OFFSET. >> > > I'm not so sure about this commit message - I don't think > it makes sense...Should it not be more like: > > ------->8------- > Subject: ARM: set PAGE_OFFSET = PHYS_OFFSET if !MMU > > With !MMU we still set PAGE_OFFSET to 0xC0000000, which > makes little sense and causes a regression on !MMU after > f6537f2f0eba4eba ("scripts/kallsyms: filter symbols not > kernel address space") > > This patch sets PAGE_OFFSET to PHYS_OFFSET in the !MMU > case, fixing the regression (Tested on Cortex-R7/Vexpress) > --------8<--------- > > Russell: Will you pick this patch up from the list or does > it need to go in through the patch system? What's the status of this patch? Shall I put it in the patch system with the commit message above? Or is it going via someone else? Jonny > > Jonny > >> This patch and patch 2/2 fix regression on !MMU by >> f6537f2f0eba4eba("scripts/kallsyms: filter symbols not >> in kernel address space") >> >> Cc: >> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Austin >> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei >> --- >> arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig >> index 799ef94..db708c4 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig >> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig >> @@ -1560,6 +1560,7 @@ endchoice >> >> config PAGE_OFFSET >> hex >> + default PHYS_OFFSET if !MMU >> default 0x40000000 if VMSPLIT_1G >> default 0x80000000 if VMSPLIT_2G >> default 0xC0000000 >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel >