From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932792Ab3LEQbm (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Dec 2013 11:31:42 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-f176.google.com ([209.85.192.176]:33763 "EHLO mail-pd0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756771Ab3LEQbj (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Dec 2013 11:31:39 -0500 Message-ID: <52A0AA5D.7080407@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 00:31:25 +0800 From: Jiang Liu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: James Hogan CC: Andrew Morton , Shaohua Li , Thomas Gleixner , "Srivatsa S. Bhat" , Paul Gortmaker , linux-metag@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , Jiri Kosina , Wang YanQing , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 10/19] smp, metag: kill SMP single function call interrupt References: <1386173591-28514-1-git-send-email-liuj97@gmail.com> <1386173591-28514-11-git-send-email-liuj97@gmail.com> <529F5A95.9050307@imgtec.com> In-Reply-To: <529F5A95.9050307@imgtec.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/05/2013 12:38 AM, James Hogan wrote: > On 04/12/13 16:13, Jiang Liu wrote: >> Commit 9a46ad6d6df3b54 "smp: make smp_call_function_many() use logic >> similar to smp_call_function_single()" has unified the way to handle >> single and multiple cross-CPU function calls. Now only one intterupt > > s/intterupt/interrupt/ > >> is needed for architecture specific code to support generic SMP function >> call interfaces, so kill the redundant single function call interrupt. >> >> Cc: Andrew Morton >> Cc: Shaohua Li >> Cc: Peter Zijlstra >> Cc: Ingo Molnar >> Cc: Steven Rostedt >> Cc: Jiri Kosina >> Cc: James Hogan >> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu > > Acked-by: James Hogan > > Do you want me to take this patch through the metag tree for v3.14 or > let it go via another tree with the other patches? Thanks for review. Appreciate if you could help to merge this patch through metag gate. > > Thanks > James >