From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
To: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>,
"'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"'Alessandro Zummo'" <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
<rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>,
"'Kevin Hilman'" <khilman@linaro.org>,
"'Tony Lindgren'" <tony@atomide.com>,
"'Peter Ujfalusi'" <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: rtc-twl: Use devm_*() functions
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 18:50:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A0AEDD.7060509@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000001cef155$be1674e0$3a435ea0$%han@samsung.com>
On 12/05/2013 03:03 AM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> Use devm_*() functions to make cleanup paths simpler, and remove
> unnecessary remove().
>
> Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c | 38 +++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
> index c2e80d7..1915464 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-twl.c
> @@ -479,7 +479,7 @@ static int twl_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> u8 rd_reg;
>
> if (irq <= 0)
> - goto out1;
> + return ret;
>
> /* Initialize the register map */
> if (twl_class_is_4030())
> @@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ static int twl_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> ret = twl_rtc_read_u8(&rd_reg, REG_RTC_STATUS_REG);
> if (ret < 0)
> - goto out1;
> + return ret;
>
> if (rd_reg & BIT_RTC_STATUS_REG_POWER_UP_M)
> dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Power up reset detected.\n");
> @@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ static int twl_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> /* Clear RTC Power up reset and pending alarm interrupts */
> ret = twl_rtc_write_u8(rd_reg, REG_RTC_STATUS_REG);
> if (ret < 0)
> - goto out1;
> + return ret;
>
> if (twl_class_is_6030()) {
> twl6030_interrupt_unmask(TWL6030_RTC_INT_MASK,
> @@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ static int twl_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Enabling TWL-RTC\n");
> ret = twl_rtc_write_u8(BIT_RTC_CTRL_REG_STOP_RTC_M, REG_RTC_CTRL_REG);
> if (ret < 0)
> - goto out1;
> + return ret;
>
> /* ensure interrupts are disabled, bootloaders can be strange */
> ret = twl_rtc_write_u8(0, REG_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG);
> @@ -522,34 +522,29 @@ static int twl_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> /* init cached IRQ enable bits */
> ret = twl_rtc_read_u8(&rtc_irq_bits, REG_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG);
> if (ret < 0)
> - goto out1;
> + return ret;
>
> device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, 1);
>
> - rtc = rtc_device_register(pdev->name,
> - &pdev->dev, &twl_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
> + rtc = devm_rtc_device_register(&pdev->dev, pdev->name,
> + &twl_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
> if (IS_ERR(rtc)) {
> - ret = PTR_ERR(rtc);
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't register RTC device, err %ld\n",
> PTR_ERR(rtc));
> - goto out1;
> + return PTR_ERR(rtc);
> }
>
> - ret = request_threaded_irq(irq, NULL, twl_rtc_interrupt,
> - IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> - dev_name(&rtc->dev), rtc);
> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, NULL,
> + twl_rtc_interrupt,
> + IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> + dev_name(&rtc->dev), rtc);
Looks like this will change driver release order and free_irq
will be called after RTC device is unregistered.
I think, you need to request irq first -> then register RTC device.
Right?
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "IRQ is not free.\n");
> - goto out2;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rtc);
> return 0;
> -
> -out2:
> - rtc_device_unregister(rtc);
> -out1:
> - return ret;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -559,9 +554,6 @@ out1:
> static int twl_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> /* leave rtc running, but disable irqs */
> - struct rtc_device *rtc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> - int irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> -
> mask_rtc_irq_bit(BIT_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG_IT_ALARM_M);
> mask_rtc_irq_bit(BIT_RTC_INTERRUPTS_REG_IT_TIMER_M);
> if (twl_class_is_6030()) {
> @@ -571,10 +563,6 @@ static int twl_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> REG_INT_MSK_STS_A);
> }
>
> -
> - free_irq(irq, rtc);
> -
> - rtc_device_unregister(rtc);
> return 0;
> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-05 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-05 1:03 [PATCH 1/2] rtc: rtc-twl: Use devm_*() functions Jingoo Han
2013-12-05 1:05 ` [PATCH 2/2] rtc: rtc-vr41xx: " Jingoo Han
2013-12-05 16:50 ` Grygorii Strashko [this message]
2013-12-06 1:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] rtc: rtc-twl: " Jingoo Han
2013-12-06 14:53 ` Grygorii Strashko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52A0AEDD.7060509@ti.com \
--to=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox