From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757004Ab3LERMt (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Dec 2013 12:12:49 -0500 Received: from avon.wwwdotorg.org ([70.85.31.133]:33096 "EHLO avon.wwwdotorg.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752131Ab3LERMr (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Dec 2013 12:12:47 -0500 Message-ID: <52A0B40B.7040903@wwwdotorg.org> Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 10:12:43 -0700 From: Stephen Warren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Agner , thierry.reding@gmail.com, dev@lynxeye.de, lee.jones@linaro.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org CC: kai.poggensee@avionic-design.de, sameo@linux.intel.com, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] ARM: tegra: correct Colibri T20 regulator settings References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/03/2013 03:18 PM, Stefan Agner wrote: > Set the parent of the regulators LDO2 to LDO9 according to the > schematic. Set the base voltage to 3.3V, there is only 3.3V on the > module itself. > > Set the Core and CPU voltage to the specified voltages of 1.2V and > 1.0V respectivly. > > LDO6 should deliver 2.85V. The attached peripherals were not in > use so far. Does this depend on patch 1/3 or 2/3, or can I apply it to the Tegra tree which doesn't include those patches? If this does depend on patch 1/3 or 2/3... this patch feels a bit big to apply to the MFD tree. Perhaps patch 1/3 and 2/3 could be applied alone to a topic branch in the MFD tree so I can merge that into the Tegra tree in order to apply this?