From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] smack: call WARN_ONCE() instead of calling audit_log_start()
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 10:40:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A21A38.40802@schaufler-ca.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f18b900087454601b1431183f705f61acd4932c7.1386206544.git.rgb@redhat.com>
On 12/4/2013 6:45 PM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> Remove the call to audit_log() (which call audit_log_start()) and deal with
> the errors in the caller, logging only once if the condition is met. Calling
> audit_log_start() in this location makes buffer allocation and locking more
> complicated in the calling tree (audit_filter_user()).
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>
I'm not opposed to this change, but have you actually tried it?
> ---
> security/smack/smack_lsm.c | 5 ++---
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> index 8825375..185e2e7 100644
> --- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> +++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
> @@ -3615,9 +3615,8 @@ static int smack_audit_rule_match(u32 secid, u32 field, u32 op, void *vrule,
> struct smack_known *skp;
> char *rule = vrule;
>
> - if (!rule) {
> - audit_log(actx, GFP_ATOMIC, AUDIT_SELINUX_ERR,
> - "Smack: missing rule\n");
> + if (unlikely(!rule)) {
> + WARN_ONCE(1, "Smack: missing rule\n");
> return -ENOENT;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-06 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-11 1:36 [BUG][PATCH][RFC] audit: hang up in audit_log_start executed on auditd Toshiyuki Okajima
2013-10-11 9:33 ` Gao feng
2013-10-11 12:29 ` Toshiyuki Okajima (smtp-b.css)
2013-10-15 4:43 ` [BUG][PATCH] audit: audit_log_start running on auditd should not stop Toshiyuki Okajima
2013-10-15 6:30 ` Gao feng
2013-10-15 7:07 ` Toshiyuki Okajima
2013-10-15 7:58 ` [BUG][PATCH V3] " Toshiyuki Okajima
2013-10-15 9:41 ` Gao feng
2013-10-23 19:55 ` [BUG][PATCH] " Richard Guy Briggs
2013-10-24 5:55 ` Gao feng
2013-10-24 19:35 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2013-10-25 1:36 ` Toshiyuki Okajima
2013-10-25 15:12 ` Eric Paris
2013-10-28 9:20 ` Toshiyuki Okajima
2013-12-05 2:45 ` [PATCH 0/3] audit: remove audit_log_start() contention in AUDIT_USER type calls Richard Guy Briggs
2013-12-05 2:45 ` [PATCH 1/3] selinux: call WARN_ONCE() instead of calling audit_log_start() Richard Guy Briggs
2013-12-05 2:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] smack: " Richard Guy Briggs
2013-12-06 18:40 ` Casey Schaufler [this message]
2013-12-08 22:17 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2013-12-05 2:45 ` [PATCH 3/3] audit: drop audit_cmd_lock in AUDIT_USER family of cases Richard Guy Briggs
2013-12-09 2:31 ` Toshiyuki Okajima
2013-12-05 7:15 ` [RESEND][BUG][PATCH V3] audit: audit_log_start running on auditd should not stop Toshiyuki Okajima
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52A21A38.40802@schaufler-ca.com \
--to=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox