From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751475Ab3LKBoZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Dec 2013 20:44:25 -0500 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]:63726 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750902Ab3LKBoY (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Dec 2013 20:44:24 -0500 Message-ID: <52A7C2F8.4090207@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:42:16 +0800 From: Xishi Qiu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H. Peter Anvin" CC: Yinghai Lu , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , the arch/x86 maintainers , Linn Crosetto , Pekka Enberg , LKML , Andrew Morton , Linux MM Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,x86: fix span coverage in e820_all_mapped() References: <52A6D9B0.7040506@huawei.com> <52A787D0.2070400@zytor.com> <52A79B0D.4090303@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.135.74.196] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2013/12/11 9:06, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Ok, the issue I thought we were discussing was actually [A,B) [B,C) [C,D) ... > Hi Peter, Yes, in this case the function will return 1. Thanks, Xishi Qiu > Yinghai Lu wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:51 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>> On 12/10/2013 01:52 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote: >>>>> >>>>> What happens if it spans more than two regions? >>>> >>>> [A, B), [B+1, C), [C+1, D) ? >>>> start in [A, B), and end in [C+1, D). >>>> >>>> old code: >>>> first with [A, B), start set to B. >>>> then with [B+1, C), start still keep as B. >>>> then with [C+1, D), start still keep as B. >>>> at last still return 0...aka not_all_mapped. >>>> >>>> old code is still right. >>>> >>> >>> Why not_all_mapped? >> >> [B, B+1), and [C, C+1) are not there. >