From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
Dietmar Hahn <dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com>
Subject: vunmap() on large regions may trigger soft lockup warnings
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 16:58:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A899AB.3010506@citrix.com> (raw)
Andrew,
Dietmar Hahn reported an issue where calling vunmap() on a large (50 GB)
region would trigger soft lockup warnings.
The following patch would resolve this (by adding a cond_resched() call
to vunmap_pmd_range()). Almost calls of vunmap(), unmap_kernel_range()
are from process context (as far as I could tell) except for an ACPI
driver (drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c) calls unmap_kernel_range_noflush()
from an interrupt and NMI contexts.
Can you advise on a preferred solution?
For example, an unmap_kernel_page() function (callable from atomic
context) could be provided since the GHES driver only maps/unmaps a
single page.
8<-------------------------
mm/vmalloc: avoid soft lockup warnings when vunmap()'ing large ranges
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
If vunmap() is used to unmap a large (e.g., 50 GB) region, it may take
sufficiently long that it triggers soft lockup warnings.
Add a cond_resched() into vunmap_pmd_range() so the calling task may
be resheduled after unmapping each PMD entry. This is how
zap_pmd_range() fixes the same problem for userspace mappings.
Reported-by: Dietmar Hahn <dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 0fdf968..b1b5b39 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ static void vunmap_pmd_range(pud_t *pud, unsigned long
addr, unsigned long end)
if (pmd_none_or_clear_bad(pmd))
continue;
vunmap_pte_range(pmd, addr, next);
+ cond_resched();
} while (pmd++, addr = next, addr != end);
}
--
1.7.2.5
next reply other threads:[~2013-12-11 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-11 16:58 David Vrabel [this message]
2013-12-11 21:39 ` vunmap() on large regions may trigger soft lockup warnings Andrew Morton
2013-12-12 12:50 ` David Vrabel
2013-12-14 8:32 ` Andrew Morton
2013-12-16 12:56 ` David Vrabel
2013-12-16 22:57 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52A899AB.3010506@citrix.com \
--to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).