public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [RFC PATCH] x86_64: double the x86_64 kernel stack size?
@ 2013-12-11  6:28 Zhouyi Zhou
  2013-12-11 20:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Zhouyi Zhou @ 2013-12-11  6:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, tglx, mingo, hpa, x86, bp, keescook, zhangyanfei
  Cc: Zhouyi Zhou

Somethings I compiled the Linux network modules (especially bridge and netfilter)
without optimization, the kernel always crashes because of exhausted kernel stack.

The similar problem has been discussed in
http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bridge/2005-January/004402.html

Is it OK the double the x86_64 kernel stack size?
 

Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <yizhouzhou@ict.ac.cn>
Tested-by: Zhouyi Zhou  <yizhouzhou@ict.ac.cn>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h
index 43dcd80..dc4c629 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/page_64_types.h
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 #ifndef _ASM_X86_PAGE_64_DEFS_H
 #define _ASM_X86_PAGE_64_DEFS_H
 
-#define THREAD_SIZE_ORDER	1
+#define THREAD_SIZE_ORDER	2
 #define THREAD_SIZE  (PAGE_SIZE << THREAD_SIZE_ORDER)
 #define CURRENT_MASK (~(THREAD_SIZE - 1))
 
-- 
1.7.10.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC PATCH] x86_64: double the x86_64 kernel stack size?
  2013-12-11  6:28 [RFC PATCH] x86_64: double the x86_64 kernel stack size? Zhouyi Zhou
@ 2013-12-11 20:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: H. Peter Anvin @ 2013-12-11 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zhouyi Zhou, linux-kernel, tglx, mingo, x86, bp, keescook,
	zhangyanfei
  Cc: Zhouyi Zhou

On 12/10/2013 10:28 PM, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> Somethings I compiled the Linux network modules (especially bridge and netfilter)
> without optimization, the kernel always crashes because of exhausted kernel stack.
> 
> The similar problem has been discussed in
> http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bridge/2005-January/004402.html
> 
> Is it OK the double the x86_64 kernel stack size?
>  

Hell no.

	-hpa


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-11 20:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-12-11  6:28 [RFC PATCH] x86_64: double the x86_64 kernel stack size? Zhouyi Zhou
2013-12-11 20:29 ` H. Peter Anvin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox