From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751358Ab3LKUat (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:30:49 -0500 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:38314 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750922Ab3LKUar (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:30:47 -0500 Message-ID: <52A8CB45.2080704@zytor.com> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:29:57 -0800 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zhouyi Zhou , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, x86@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, keescook@chromium.org, zhangyanfei@cn.fujitsu.com CC: Zhouyi Zhou Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86_64: double the x86_64 kernel stack size? References: <1386743332-32171-1-git-send-email-yizhouzhou@ict.ac.cn> In-Reply-To: <1386743332-32171-1-git-send-email-yizhouzhou@ict.ac.cn> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/10/2013 10:28 PM, Zhouyi Zhou wrote: > Somethings I compiled the Linux network modules (especially bridge and netfilter) > without optimization, the kernel always crashes because of exhausted kernel stack. > > The similar problem has been discussed in > http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bridge/2005-January/004402.html > > Is it OK the double the x86_64 kernel stack size? > Hell no. -hpa