From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
"linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org" <linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xtensa: Switch to sched_clock_register()
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 15:54:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52AA4CB8.1010008@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <528CFEE9.3060108@codeaurora.org>
On 11/20/13 10:26, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 11/17/13 12:27, Max Filippov wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 3:31 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>> The 32 bit sched_clock interface now supports 64 bits. Upgrade
>>> to the 64 bit function to allow us to remove the 32 bit
>>> registration interface.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Patch is based on Linus' tip. Not event compile tested.
>>>
>>> arch/xtensa/kernel/time.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> Build and run-tested, appears to work.
>> Acked-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
>>
>> Should it go through xtensa tree, or through some other tree as a part
>> of a bigger conversion series?
> If it can go through xtensa that sounds like the best option. Otherwise
> we can send it through the tip/timers tree.
>
Ping? I don't see this patch in linux-next yet so should I send this
through the tip/timers tree?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-12 23:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-15 23:31 [PATCH] xtensa: Switch to sched_clock_register() Stephen Boyd
2013-11-17 20:27 ` Max Filippov
2013-11-20 18:26 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-12 23:54 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2013-12-13 0:00 ` czankel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52AA4CB8.1010008@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox