From: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
To: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org>
Cc: Hushiyuan <hushiyuan@huawei.com>,
<openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Zhangdianfang <zhangdianfang@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ipmi: fix timeout calculation when bmc is disconnected
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:39:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52AA7377.4070408@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52AA72B4.4080807@huawei.com>
Loading ipmi_si module while bmc is disconnected, we found the timeout
is longer than 5 secs. Actually it takes about 3 mins and 20 secs.(HZ=250)
error message as below:
Dec 12 19:08:59 linux kernel: IPMI BT: timeout in RD_WAIT [ ] 1 retries left
Dec 12 19:08:59 linux kernel: BT: write 4 bytes seq=0x01 03 18 00 01
[...]
Dec 12 19:12:19 linux kernel: IPMI BT: timeout in RD_WAIT [ ]
Dec 12 19:12:19 linux kernel: failed 2 retries, sending error response
Dec 12 19:12:19 linux kernel: IPMI: BT reset (takes 5 secs)
Dec 12 19:12:19 linux kernel: IPMI BT: flag reset [ ]
Function wait_for_msg_done() use schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1) to
sleep 1 tick, so we should subtract jiffies_to_usecs(1) instead of 100
usecs from timeout.
Reported-by: Hu Shiyuan <hushiyuan@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
---
drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
index af4b23f..e086d82 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
@@ -2707,7 +2707,7 @@ static int wait_for_msg_done(struct smi_info *smi_info)
smi_result == SI_SM_CALL_WITH_TICK_DELAY) {
schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
smi_result = smi_info->handlers->event(
- smi_info->si_sm, 100);
+ smi_info->si_sm, jiffies_to_usecs(1));
} else if (smi_result == SI_SM_CALL_WITHOUT_DELAY) {
smi_result = smi_info->handlers->event(
smi_info->si_sm, 0);
--
1.8.2.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-13 2:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-13 2:36 [PATCH 0/2] ipmi: fix timeout calculation when bmc is disconnected Xie XiuQi
2013-12-13 2:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] ipmi: use USEC_PER_SEC instead of 1000000 for more meaningful Xie XiuQi
2013-12-13 2:39 ` Xie XiuQi [this message]
2013-12-13 3:15 ` [PATCH 0/2] ipmi: fix timeout calculation when bmc is disconnected Corey Minyard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52AA7377.4070408@huawei.com \
--to=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
--cc=hushiyuan@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=minyard@acm.org \
--cc=openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=zhangdianfang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox