From: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"'Marek Szyprowski'" <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
"'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@redhat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kernel/locking: mutex: simplify access to the first entry in the wait-list
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 07:24:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52AAA806.30406@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131212125203.GI21999@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Hello Ingo & Peter,
I added Greg on Cc.
W dniu 12.12.2013 13:52, Peter Zijlstra pisze:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 09:02:07PM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Peter Zijlstra [mailto:peterz@infradead.org]
>>> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 8:35 PM
>>> To: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
>>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Kyungmin Park; Marek Szyprowski; Ingo
>>> Molnar
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kernel/locking: mutex: simplify access to the
>>> first entry in the wait-list
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:29:32PM +0100, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote:
>>>> Use list_first_entry instead of explicitly accessing the first entry
>>>> with "head".next. The comment one line above becomes obsolete.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzej.p@samsung.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
>>>> ---
For quite a long time I've been sending the same SOB lines to the
linux-usb list.
Can you please refer here:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg74981.html
>>>>
>>>> v1..v2:
>>>>
>>>> - corrected the email address in the second Signed-off-by line
>>>
>>> Still invalid; the problem is that you appear to have written the patch
>>> (you send it and you have first sob).
>>
>>
>>> So what is Kyungmin doing in the line? He did not send me your patch.
>>
>> Internal review process, and it represents this patch comes from.
>
> For review we have this specific tag, oddly called: 'Reviewed-by'.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-13 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-12 11:29 [PATCH v2] kernel/locking: mutex: simplify access to the first entry in the wait-list Andrzej Pietrasiewicz
2013-12-12 11:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-12 12:02 ` Kyungmin Park
2013-12-12 12:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-12 12:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-13 6:24 ` Andrzej Pietrasiewicz [this message]
2013-12-13 14:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-12-13 14:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-14 17:26 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-12-13 14:04 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52AAA806.30406@samsung.com \
--to=andrzej.p@samsung.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox