Re: [PATCH 2/2] romfs: remove an redundant if condition in romfs_readpage

[Rui Xiang <rui.xiang@huawei.com>]

On 2013/12/16 16:10, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2013 16:39:09 +0800 Rui Xiang <rui.xiang@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
>> Here ret always equals 0, so SetPageUptodate directly.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/fs/romfs/super.c
>> +++ b/fs/romfs/super.c
>> @@ -129,8 +129,7 @@ static int romfs_readpage(struct file *file, struct page *page)
>>  
>>  	if (fillsize < PAGE_SIZE)
>>  		memset(buf + fillsize, 0, PAGE_SIZE - fillsize);
>> -	if (ret == 0)
>> -		SetPageUptodate(page);
>> +	SetPageUptodate(page);
>>  
>>  	flush_dcache_page(page);
>>  	kunmap(page);
> 
> Nope, `ret' can be -EIO:
> 
> 	ret = 0;
> 	if (offset < size) {
> 		size -= offset;
> 		fillsize = size > PAGE_SIZE ? PAGE_SIZE : size;
> 
> 		pos = ROMFS_I(inode)->i_dataoffset + offset;
> 
> 		ret = romfs_dev_read(inode->i_sb, pos, buf, fillsize);
> 		if (ret < 0) {
> 			SetPageError(page);
> 			fillsize = 0;
> -->>			ret = -EIO;
> 		}
> 	}
> 
> 	if (fillsize < PAGE_SIZE)
> 		memset(buf + fillsize, 0, PAGE_SIZE - fillsize);
> 	if (ret == 0)
> 		SetPageUptodate(page);
> 
> 
> It was a bit rude to overwrite the romfs_dev_read() return code though.
> 

Ah, my fault. Ignore that, please.