linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
	Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	systemtap@sourceware.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH -tip v4 0/6] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and fixes crash bugs
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:53:40 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52AEDBB4.5060502@hitachi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52AA9C55.1000103@hitachi.com>

Hi Ingo,

(2013/12/13 14:34), Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>>>> And also, even if we can detect the recursion, we can't stop the 
>>>>> kernel, we need to skip the probe. This means that we need to 
>>>>> recover to the main execution path by doing single step. As you 
>>>>> may know, since the single stepping involves the debug exception, 
>>>>> we have to avoid proving on that path too. Or we'll have an 
>>>>> infinite recursion again.
>>>>
>>>> I don't see why this is needed: if a "probing is disabled" 
>>>> recursion flag is set the moment the first probe fires, and if 
>>>> it's only cleared once all processing is finished, then any 
>>>> intermediate probes should simply return early from int3 and not 
>>>> fire.
>>>
>>> No, because the int3 already changes the original instruction.
>>> This means that you cannot skip singlestep(or emulate) the
>>> instruction which is copied to execution buffer (ainsn->insn),
>>> even if you have such the flag.
>>> So, kprobe requires the annotations on the singlestep path.
>>
>> I don't understand this reasoning.
>>
>> Lets assume we allow a probe to be inserted in the single-step path. 
>> Such a probe will be an INT3 instruction and if it hits we get a 
>> recursive INT3 invocation. In that case the INT3 handler should simply
>> restore the original instruction and _leave it so_. There's no 
>> single-stepping needed - the probe is confused and must be discarded.
> 
> But how can we restore the protected kernel text?
> If we use text_poke, we also need to prohibit probing on the text_poke
> and functions called in the text_poke too. That just shifts the annotated
> area to the text_poke. :(


OK, I've checked current text_poke() and thought how we can do that.
The current text_poke() uses special fixmap to make alias pages for
avoiding kernel-text readonly protection. For protecting the fixmap
pages, we are currently using text_mutex and this is why we can't use
it in exception path. There are other minor issues, but it seems to
be fixed easily. :)

Thus, for recovering original instruction in the int3 handler,
I'd like to propose adding another text_poke like function, which
requires another fixmap page and protects it by using raw_spinlock
(to avoid tracing), and just support one-byte poke (this means it
 never across the page boundary).

Perhaps, it can be implemented inside kprobes, because it is not
useful for other subsystems.

Thank you!


-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com



  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-12-16 10:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-04  1:28 [PATCH -tip v4 0/6] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and fixes crash bugs Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-04  1:28 ` [PATCH -tip v4 1/6] kprobes: Prohibit probing on .entry.text code Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-04  1:28 ` [PATCH -tip v4 2/6] kprobes: Introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() macro for blacklist Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-04  1:28 ` [PATCH -tip v4 3/6] [BUGFIX] kprobes/x86: Prohibit probing on debug_stack_* Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-04  1:28 ` [PATCH -tip v4 4/6] [BUGFIX] x86: Prohibit probing on native_set_debugreg Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-04  1:28 ` [PATCH -tip v4 5/6] [BUGFIX] x86: Prohibit probing on thunk functions and restore Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-04  1:28 ` [PATCH -tip v4 6/6] [RFC] kprobes/x86: Call exception handlers directly from do_int3/do_debug Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-04  2:39   ` Steven Rostedt
2013-12-11 13:31     ` Jiri Kosina
2013-12-12  4:40       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-12  9:59         ` Jiri Kosina
2013-12-12 10:31           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-04  2:54 ` [PATCH -tip v4 0/6] kprobes: introduce NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() and fixes crash bugs Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-12-04  7:39   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-04  8:46     ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-12-04 23:32       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-04  8:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-04 23:27   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-05 10:21     ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-06  2:34       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-10 15:28         ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-11  2:12           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-11 13:34             ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-12  6:02               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-12 14:03                 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-12 20:42                   ` Josh Stone
2013-12-13  5:34                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-13  6:06                     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-16 10:53                     ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2013-12-05 13:08     ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-12-06  6:23       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-06  6:54         ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-12-06 23:25           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-05 14:49     ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2013-12-06  6:12       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-06 19:07         ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2013-12-06 23:19           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-12-07  1:32             ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2013-12-07  2:34               ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52AEDBB4.5060502@hitachi.com \
    --to=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org \
    --cc=systemtap@sourceware.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).