From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754884Ab3LPRtQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:49:16 -0500 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:65059 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754704Ab3LPRtN (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:49:13 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,496,1384329600"; d="scan'208";a="450861270" Message-ID: <52AF3CF0.3090502@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 19:48:32 +0200 From: Eliezer Tamir User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Zijlstra CC: Arjan van de Ven , lenb@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, rui.zhang@intel.com, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, Mike Galbraith , Ingo Molnar , hpa@zytor.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Thomas Gleixner , John Stultz , Andy Lutomirski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] cleanups and optimizations References: <20131212140835.729222186@infradead.org> <52AAE61D.4060406@linux.intel.com> <20131213135626.GL21999@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> In-Reply-To: <20131213135626.GL21999@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 13/12/2013 15:56, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:49:01PM +0200, Eliezer Tamir wrote: >> On 12/12/2013 16:08, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> This series contains the preempt_enable_no_resched() cleanups that include >>> spin_lock_bh() optimizations and local_clock() optimizations. >> >> I'm trying to test this on tip/master. >> Patch 3 fails to apply on kenrel/softirq.c > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/peterz/queue.git/log/?h=preempt_clock > > Applied just fine here.. stuffed it in a git tree. Thanks, That worked. My test is, netperf TCP_RR 1 byte, with busy polling enabled, 30s run. I see 92.0K RR with your patches, 91.8K RR with out them. This is barely above the noise level, but I'm pretty sure it's real. In any case I don't see any regression. Thanks, Eliezer