From: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>, thierry.reding@gmail.com
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: tegra: fix missing pincontrol configuration for Venice2
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 13:56:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52B20C0D.9030200@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1387371179-16725-1-git-send-email-ldewangan@nvidia.com>
On 12/18/2013 05:52 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> Compare the initial population of default pinmux configuration of Venice2
> with the chrome branch and add/fix the missing configurations.
Wow, that's a big chunk of changes. Are you sure this is correct? Why
was the original patch (which added the pinctrl nodes) so incorrect?
Thierry, I thought you had mentioned comparing the pinctrl setup in
linux-next with the downstream kernel for Venice2 and only found a
difference in the PWM settings, which you sent a patch for. However,
this patch is much larger than that. Where's the disconnect?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-18 20:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-18 12:52 [PATCH 1/2] ARM: tegra: fix missing pincontrol configuration for Venice2 Laxman Dewangan
2013-12-18 12:52 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] ARM: tegra: add ams AS3722 device to Venice2 DT Laxman Dewangan
2013-12-18 20:55 ` Stephen Warren
2013-12-19 7:28 ` Laxman Dewangan
2013-12-19 17:24 ` Stephen Warren
2013-12-19 18:23 ` Stephen Warren
2013-12-20 6:32 ` Laxman Dewangan
2013-12-18 20:56 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
2013-12-19 7:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: tegra: fix missing pincontrol configuration for Venice2 Laxman Dewangan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52B20C0D.9030200@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).