From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751785Ab3LSGR1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Dec 2013 01:17:27 -0500 Received: from mail.active-venture.com ([67.228.131.205]:65342 "EHLO mail.active-venture.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750954Ab3LSGRZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Dec 2013 01:17:25 -0500 X-Originating-IP: 108.223.40.66 Message-ID: <52B28F73.7080800@roeck-us.net> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 22:17:23 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.12 000/118] 3.12.6-stable review References: <20131218211219.461663463@linuxfoundation.org> <20131219032745.GA29603@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20131219032745.GA29603@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/18/2013 07:27 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 01:10:37PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.6 release. >> There are 118 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >> let me know. >> >> Responses should be made by Fri Dec 20 21:12:03 UTC 2013. >> Anything received after that time might be too late. >> >> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.12.6-rc1.gz >> and the diffstat can be found below. > > Thanks to a bug on my part, there's now a -rc2 out for people to test > with: > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.12.6-rc2.gz > > Note, if you didn't have a build-failure with -rc1 then no need to test > -rc2, it's only a specific staging driver that had an issue. > Build results are much better: total: 110 pass: 107 skipped: 3 fail: 0 qemu tests still all pass. Guenter